Contribution of pollinators to delivering fruit quality in commercial sweet cherry orchards

Abstract Background Pollinators provide an essential ecosystem service to many crops, including sweet cherry ( Prunus avium ), which can be quantified in terms of fruit number and/or quality. Most studies in sweet cherry have explored the extent to which fruit set relies on pollinators but have neglected pollinators' contribution to fruit quality. We investigated the impact of pollinators on fruit set (2018–2019) and fruit quality (2017–2019). In 10 commercial sweet cherry orchards under polytunnels, we conducted insect‐exclusion experiments comparing insect‐excluded blossoms (mesh‐bagged blossoms) to blossoms exposed to floral visitors (open blossoms). We then investigated relationships between fruit set and fruit quality. Results Pollinators were key to underpinning commercial fruit set (15.4% fruit set from open blossoms compared to 1.1% with bagged blossoms), equivalent to a contribution of 92.8%. Pollinators were also essential to achieving higher cherry fruit quality. With open blossoms, fresh mass, width, dry matter, and flesh/pit ratio of cherries increased by 19.8%, 7.9%, 19.8%, and 10.5%, respectively, compared to cherries from bagged blossoms. In contrast, firmness was similar between both pollination treatments. We did not find a significant relationship between fruit set and quality, suggesting trees did not carry an excessive fruit burden. Conclusion Our results highlight the importance of pollinators, not only for underpinning commercial yields in terms of fruit set, but also for higher fruit quality. We recommend growers adopt effective pollinator management practices to help underpin commercially viable yields consisting of fruit with a higher marketable potential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JSFA reports
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsf2.70012
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contribution of pollinators to delivering fruit quality in commercial sweet cherry orchards

Duncan B. Westbury, Michelle T. Fountain, Michael P. D. Garratt, Zeus Mateos‐Fierro et al.
1 citations
JSFA reports
Plant and animal studies
3.03
article

Contribution of pollinators to delivering fruit quality in commercial sweet cherry orchards

Duncan B. Westbury, Michelle T. Fountain, Michael P. D. Garratt, Zeus Mateos‐Fierro, Kate Ashbrook
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Pollinators provide an essential ecosystem service to many crops, including sweet cherry ( Prunus avium ), which can be quantified in terms of fruit number and/or quality. Most studies in sweet cherry have explored the extent to which fruit set relies on pollinators but have neglected pollinators' contribution to fruit quality. We investigated the impact of pollinators on fruit set (2018–2019) and fruit quality (2017–2019). In 10 commercial sweet cherry orchards under polytunnels, we conducted insect‐exclusion experiments comparing insect‐excluded blossoms (mesh‐bagged blossoms) to blossoms exposed to floral visitors (open blossoms). We then investigated relationships between fruit set and fruit quality. Results Pollinators were key to underpinning commercial fruit set (15.4% fruit set from open blossoms compared to 1.1% with bagged blossoms), equivalent to a contribution of 92.8%. Pollinators were also essential to achieving higher cherry fruit quality. With open blossoms, fresh mass, width, dry matter, and flesh/pit ratio of cherries increased by 19.8%, 7.9%, 19.8%, and 10.5%, respectively, compared to cherries from bagged blossoms. In contrast, firmness was similar between both pollination treatments. We did not find a significant relationship between fruit set and quality, suggesting trees did not carry an excessive fruit burden. Conclusion Our results highlight the importance of pollinators, not only for underpinning commercial yields in terms of fruit set, but also for higher fruit quality. We recommend growers adopt effective pollinator management practices to help underpin commercially viable yields consisting of fruit with a higher marketable potential.

JSFA reportsVol. 5(8)
East Malling Research (United Kingdom) (GB), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), University of Reading (GB), University of Worcester (GB), Royal Agricultural University (GB)
University of Worcester
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Plant and animal studies
3.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.