Opposition and Implication in Aristotelian Diagrams

In logical geometry, Aristotelian diagrams are studied in a systematic fashion. Recent developments in this field have shown that the square of opposition generalizes in two ways, which correspond precisely to the theory of opposition (leading to α-structures) and the theory of implication (leading to ladders) it exhibits. These two kinds of Aristotelian diagrams are dual to each other, in the sense that they are the oppositional and implicative counterpart of the same construction. This paper formalizes this duality as OI-companionship, explores its properties, and applies it to various σ-diagrams. This investigation shows that OI-companionship has some interesting, but unusual behaviors. While it is symmetric, and works well on the level of Aristotelian families, it lacks (ir)reflexivity, transitivity, functionality, and seriality. However, we show that all important Aristotelian families from the literature do have a unique OI-companion. These findings explore the limits that arise when extending the duality between opposition and implication beyond the limits of α-structures and ladders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Axioms
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms14050370
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opposition and Implication in Aristotelian Diagrams

Alexander De Klerck
Axioms
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

Opposition and Implication in Aristotelian Diagrams

Alexander De Klerck
article en

Abstract

In logical geometry, Aristotelian diagrams are studied in a systematic fashion. Recent developments in this field have shown that the square of opposition generalizes in two ways, which correspond precisely to the theory of opposition (leading to α-structures) and the theory of implication (leading to ladders) it exhibits. These two kinds of Aristotelian diagrams are dual to each other, in the sense that they are the oppositional and implicative counterpart of the same construction. This paper formalizes this duality as OI-companionship, explores its properties, and applies it to various σ-diagrams. This investigation shows that OI-companionship has some interesting, but unusual behaviors. While it is symmetric, and works well on the level of Aristotelian families, it lacks (ir)reflexivity, transitivity, functionality, and seriality. However, we show that all important Aristotelian families from the literature do have a unique OI-companion. These findings explore the limits that arise when extending the duality between opposition and implication beyond the limits of α-structures and ladders.

AxiomsVol. 14(5)
KU Leuven (BE)
European Commission, European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.