Cybersecurity and the Fight against Cybercrime: Partners or Competitors?

Abstract In the early 2000, cybersecurity breaches were classified as “Internet crimes” and therefore managed through the tools of the criminal justice system. The Budapest Convention on Cybercrime forged new incriminating provisions and new procedural guidelines, updating the categories of criminal law and criminal procedure for the digital age. This style, unfortunately, has proved to be insufficient. To face the growing number of threats, the EU has shifted towards a much more preemptive, administrative-law-based approach to cybersecurity, with a view to protect critical infrastructure and industries from disruptive attacks. The criminal layer, however, has not been replaced: the relevant, international instruments are still there, and they have been recently extended to cover more ground. The essay will examine the new wave of legislation on cybercrime such as the United Nations Cybercrime Treaty, trying to identify the interactions and the frictions between two different contrast strategies to abusive cyber operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2025.31
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cybersecurity and the Fight against Cybercrime: Partners or Competitors?

Laura Bartoli
2 citations
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
6.49
article

Cybersecurity and the Fight against Cybercrime: Partners or Competitors?

Laura Bartoli
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In the early 2000, cybersecurity breaches were classified as “Internet crimes” and therefore managed through the tools of the criminal justice system. The Budapest Convention on Cybercrime forged new incriminating provisions and new procedural guidelines, updating the categories of criminal law and criminal procedure for the digital age. This style, unfortunately, has proved to be insufficient. To face the growing number of threats, the EU has shifted towards a much more preemptive, administrative-law-based approach to cybersecurity, with a view to protect critical infrastructure and industries from disruptive attacks. The criminal layer, however, has not been replaced: the relevant, international instruments are still there, and they have been recently extended to cover more ground. The essay will examine the new wave of legislation on cybercrime such as the United Nations Cybercrime Treaty, trying to identify the interactions and the frictions between two different contrast strategies to abusive cyber operations.

European Journal of Risk RegulationVol. 16(2)
University of Bologna (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.