ChatGPT artificial intelligence in clinical data analysis: an example comparing standard vs fusion prostate biopsy outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RaRP)
ChatGPT (version 4.0) proved reliable for statistical analysis, showing strong concordance with human statisticians (κ = 1.0) in performing logistic regression, chi-square, and ANOVA tests. The Q-EVAL tool could reduce query errors, though ChatGPT's lack of automatic citations remains a limitation. Fusion biopsy significantly lowered upstaging risk after RaRP. In conclusion, ChatGPT is a valuable assistive tool but further research is required to optimize human-AI collaboration in clinical research.
Authors
- Francesco Saverio Grossi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2985-6526)
- Arman Tsaturyan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2499-7015)
- Pier Paolo Prontera (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6321-946X)
- Francesco Addabbo
- Carmine Sciorio (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6846-079X)
- Marco Lattarulo
- Francesca Romana Prusciano
Institutions
- AOL (United States) (US)
- Tartu Health Care College (EE)
- Alessandro Manzoni Hospital (IT)
- Ospedale SS. Annunziata (IT)
- Yerevan State Medical University (AM)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia
- Published
- 2025-05-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2025.13596
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.52