The Impact of Prophylactic Polishing Pastes on the Surface Roughness, Color, and Stain Resistance of CAD/CAM Restorative Materials

<b>Background:</b> Prophylactic polishing pastes (PPPs) are widely used to clean teeth and dental restorations; however, their effects on restorative materials are crucial for clinical outcomes. This study investigates the impact of PPPs on the susceptibility of CAD/CAM restorative materials to staining and the relationship between surface roughness and discoloration. <b>Methods:</b> Samples of tested materials (resin nanoceramic, hybrid ceramic, feldspathic ceramic, and lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic) were treated with various PPPs (Cleanic, CleanJoy, Detartrine, Proxyt). Surface roughness and color parameters were recorded before and after the PPP application and following coffee immersion for 12 days. Initial measurements of surface roughness (Ra1) and color were taken. The specimens were divided into groups based on the PPP applied. After PPP application, secondary roughness (Ra2) and color values were measured. Changes in roughness (ΔRa), color (ΔE*ab, ΔE00), and whiteness index (ΔWID) were calculated post-application and after coffee immersion. Data normality was tested with the Shapiro-Wilks test. Two-way ANOVA evaluated the effects of material type and PPP on ΔE, ΔWID, and ΔRa. One-way ANOVA, Tukey HDS test, and Pearson correlation were used for further analysis, with significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results:</b> The Vita Enamic-Detartrine group showed the highest ΔEab 1 and ΔE001 values, while Cerasmart-control showed the lowest. The Vita Enamic-Proxyt group had the lowest ΔWID1, and Vita Enamic-Cleanjoy exhibited the highest values of ΔEab 2, ΔE002, and ΔWID2. The E.MAX-control group had the lowest values for these metrics. No significant correlation was found between ΔRa and color changes (ΔE*ab 2, ΔE002, ΔWID2); however, a moderate positive correlation was found between values of ΔE1 and ΔE2. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings indicate that PPPs significantly affect the discoloration and surface features of CAD/CAM materials, with both types of PPPs and materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13050212
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Prophylactic Polishing Pastes on the Surface Roughness, Color, and Stain Resistance of CAD/CAM Restorative Materials

Neslihan Tınastepe, Ipek Iscan, Betul Arkan
Dentistry Journal
Dental materials and restorations
article

The Impact of Prophylactic Polishing Pastes on the Surface Roughness, Color, and Stain Resistance of CAD/CAM Restorative Materials

Neslihan Tınastepe, Ipek Iscan, Betul Arkan
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Prophylactic polishing pastes (PPPs) are widely used to clean teeth and dental restorations; however, their effects on restorative materials are crucial for clinical outcomes. This study investigates the impact of PPPs on the susceptibility of CAD/CAM restorative materials to staining and the relationship between surface roughness and discoloration. <b>Methods:</b> Samples of tested materials (resin nanoceramic, hybrid ceramic, feldspathic ceramic, and lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic) were treated with various PPPs (Cleanic, CleanJoy, Detartrine, Proxyt). Surface roughness and color parameters were recorded before and after the PPP application and following coffee immersion for 12 days. Initial measurements of surface roughness (Ra1) and color were taken. The specimens were divided into groups based on the PPP applied. After PPP application, secondary roughness (Ra2) and color values were measured. Changes in roughness (ΔRa), color (ΔE*ab, ΔE00), and whiteness index (ΔWID) were calculated post-application and after coffee immersion. Data normality was tested with the Shapiro-Wilks test. Two-way ANOVA evaluated the effects of material type and PPP on ΔE, ΔWID, and ΔRa. One-way ANOVA, Tukey HDS test, and Pearson correlation were used for further analysis, with significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results:</b> The Vita Enamic-Detartrine group showed the highest ΔEab 1 and ΔE001 values, while Cerasmart-control showed the lowest. The Vita Enamic-Proxyt group had the lowest ΔWID1, and Vita Enamic-Cleanjoy exhibited the highest values of ΔEab 2, ΔE002, and ΔWID2. The E.MAX-control group had the lowest values for these metrics. No significant correlation was found between ΔRa and color changes (ΔE*ab 2, ΔE002, ΔWID2); however, a moderate positive correlation was found between values of ΔE1 and ΔE2. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings indicate that PPPs significantly affect the discoloration and surface features of CAD/CAM materials, with both types of PPPs and materials.

Dentistry JournalVol. 13(5)
Üsküdar University (TR), Istanbul Medipol University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.