The Myth of the African Balkanization: Between Self-Determination, Secession, and Respect for Post-Colonial Borders

One of the biggest challenges to Pan-Africanism was the terrible risk of Balkanization, which is the process of breaking apart a territory or state unit into smaller regions and nations, potentially leading to political instability and violence. Balkanization never happened, and Africa never experienced the instability that separatist movements would cause. Very few were the cases of secession. This essay aims to challenge the conventional reading of the term Balkanization, which has been used for different ends in changing juridical, ideological, historical, and political contexts. Studying the term helps debunking some myths, stressing how Balkanization was often instrumentalized in many ways by different political actors, but its analysis is also a chance to reflect on the forgotten complexity of African politics over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asian and African Studies
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096251341582
Primary Topic
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Myth of the African Balkanization: Between Self-Determination, Secession, and Respect for Post-Colonial Borders

Francesco Tamburini
Journal of Asian and African Studies
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
article

The Myth of the African Balkanization: Between Self-Determination, Secession, and Respect for Post-Colonial Borders

Francesco Tamburini
article en

Abstract

One of the biggest challenges to Pan-Africanism was the terrible risk of Balkanization, which is the process of breaking apart a territory or state unit into smaller regions and nations, potentially leading to political instability and violence. Balkanization never happened, and Africa never experienced the instability that separatist movements would cause. Very few were the cases of secession. This essay aims to challenge the conventional reading of the term Balkanization, which has been used for different ends in changing juridical, ideological, historical, and political contexts. Studying the term helps debunking some myths, stressing how Balkanization was often instrumentalized in many ways by different political actors, but its analysis is also a chance to reflect on the forgotten complexity of African politics over time.

Journal of Asian and African Studies
University of Pisa (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.