ANALYZING THE INTERACTION OF CITIZENSHIP, PHILANTHROPY, AND STATE RELATIONS IN THE SOCIOCULTURAL CONTEXT

This study set out to investigate how the state and its citizens create their connection under the framework of philanthropy. In order to identify the pattern of interactions between the public, the government, and the charitable movement, this study employed a grounded theory methodology. The study's findings suggested that, in terms of the state's constitutionally imposed duties to its citizens, aiding their welfare—which the state actively pursued—was not so much philanthropy as it was an obligation to the people. The argument we could make was that the government, philanthropic institutions, and citizens should work together to establish a complementary meeting point. This is because the government is responsible for attending to the basic needs of the community, while foreign philanthropic institutions concentrate on empowering other domains, like advocacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integralistik
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15294/1kj4sv30
Primary Topic
Religion, Society, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ANALYZING THE INTERACTION OF CITIZENSHIP, PHILANTHROPY, AND STATE RELATIONS IN THE SOCIOCULTURAL CONTEXT

Iqbal Arpannudin
Integralistik
Religion, Society, and Development
article

ANALYZING THE INTERACTION OF CITIZENSHIP, PHILANTHROPY, AND STATE RELATIONS IN THE SOCIOCULTURAL CONTEXT

Iqbal Arpannudin
article en

Abstract

This study set out to investigate how the state and its citizens create their connection under the framework of philanthropy. In order to identify the pattern of interactions between the public, the government, and the charitable movement, this study employed a grounded theory methodology. The study's findings suggested that, in terms of the state's constitutionally imposed duties to its citizens, aiding their welfare—which the state actively pursued—was not so much philanthropy as it was an obligation to the people. The argument we could make was that the government, philanthropic institutions, and citizens should work together to establish a complementary meeting point. This is because the government is responsible for attending to the basic needs of the community, while foreign philanthropic institutions concentrate on empowering other domains, like advocacy.

IntegralistikVol. 35(2)
Yogyakarta State University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Religion, Society, and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.