Pioneers, critical observers and hesitants – a taxonomy of identities of female directors on supervisory boards

Purpose The purpose of this study is to understand the identities of female members on supervisory boards of large listed German companies based on their minority position. Design/methodology/approach The study draws upon 15 qualitative interviews with female board members in large listed companies in Germany. They are content-analyzed with a three-phase procedure informed by Mayring (2014). Findings The authors discerned three distinctive identity positions that female directors establish when narrating their experiences as members of the supervisory board: “pioneer,” “critical observer,” and “hesitant.” These identities represent how female board members situate themselves at the intersection between their function as a board member and their gender. Originality/value Drawing upon social identity theory and tokenism theory, the authors develop a taxonomy of identities among female board members who hold minority positions. This study contributes to gender-oriented research in corporate governance and tokenism theory by extending the identity issue as an important element beyond the sole “numbers” in relation to the majority and minority in supervisory boards.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Governance
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-11-2024-0633
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pioneers, critical observers and hesitants – a taxonomy of identities of female directors on supervisory boards

Irma Rybnikova, Thomas Steger, Ingo Winkler
Corporate Governance
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Pioneers, critical observers and hesitants – a taxonomy of identities of female directors on supervisory boards

Irma Rybnikova, Thomas Steger, Ingo Winkler
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to understand the identities of female members on supervisory boards of large listed German companies based on their minority position. Design/methodology/approach The study draws upon 15 qualitative interviews with female board members in large listed companies in Germany. They are content-analyzed with a three-phase procedure informed by Mayring (2014). Findings The authors discerned three distinctive identity positions that female directors establish when narrating their experiences as members of the supervisory board: “pioneer,” “critical observer,” and “hesitant.” These identities represent how female board members situate themselves at the intersection between their function as a board member and their gender. Originality/value Drawing upon social identity theory and tokenism theory, the authors develop a taxonomy of identities among female board members who hold minority positions. This study contributes to gender-oriented research in corporate governance and tokenism theory by extending the identity issue as an important element beyond the sole “numbers” in relation to the majority and minority in supervisory boards.

Corporate GovernanceVol. 25(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.