Access, trust, and equity in vaccination: A historical and sociolegal analysis of vaccination laws in Australia

A central challenge in vaccination policy, and public health generally, is the tension that arises between the interests of the community and the interests of individuals. Over the previous two centuries, a range of legislative interventions have been used in efforts to improve vaccination rates, with varying degrees of success in navigating that central challenge. Here, we use a historical and sociolegal approach to characterise and evaluate vaccination laws in Australia from 1853 to the present. In doing so, we provide both a descriptive account of how vaccination laws have operated in Australia and a normative argument for what the role of law should be in relation to vaccination. This study highlights that the role of law in creating accessible, trustworthy, and equitable systems for vaccination is more influential in achieving public health goals than coercive approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Law International
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332251338671
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Access, trust, and equity in vaccination: A historical and sociolegal analysis of vaccination laws in Australia

Rebekah McWhirter, Irene Carlet
Medical Law International
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Access, trust, and equity in vaccination: A historical and sociolegal analysis of vaccination laws in Australia

Rebekah McWhirter, Irene Carlet
article en

Abstract

A central challenge in vaccination policy, and public health generally, is the tension that arises between the interests of the community and the interests of individuals. Over the previous two centuries, a range of legislative interventions have been used in efforts to improve vaccination rates, with varying degrees of success in navigating that central challenge. Here, we use a historical and sociolegal approach to characterise and evaluate vaccination laws in Australia from 1853 to the present. In doing so, we provide both a descriptive account of how vaccination laws have operated in Australia and a normative argument for what the role of law should be in relation to vaccination. This study highlights that the role of law in creating accessible, trustworthy, and equitable systems for vaccination is more influential in achieving public health goals than coercive approaches.

Medical Law InternationalVol. 25(4)
Australian National University (AU), Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.