Animals, Robots, Numbers, and Monsters: Dehumanization Spillover in Prison Work

Prisons are unique places of employment in that workers must participate in and witness norms deliberately designed to disempower and incapacitate incarcerated individuals. For prison workers to provide care, custody, and control, they must often perform emotion management strategies to resolve the emotional dissonance of their work, including by dehumanizing the incarcerated people they work with. On the basis of interviews with 22 participants who work inside or in conjunction with prisons, the authors develop the concept of dehumanization spillover to understand how the emotion practice of dehumanization spills outside the relationship with the incarcerated and outside the prison walls to affect prison workers inside and outside of their work role. A classic understanding of dehumanization, as practices that prison workers do to incarcerated individuals, is broadened to encompass workers’ experiences with administrators and coworkers and the negative impacts of prison work on workers’ sense of self and interactions outside of work. This adds to our understanding of dehumanization as an institutional rather than a merely inter-group process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231251334410
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Animals, Robots, Numbers, and Monsters: Dehumanization Spillover in Prison Work

Jamie J. Chapman, Marci D. Cottingham
Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Animals, Robots, Numbers, and Monsters: Dehumanization Spillover in Prison Work

Jamie J. Chapman, Marci D. Cottingham
article en

Abstract

Prisons are unique places of employment in that workers must participate in and witness norms deliberately designed to disempower and incapacitate incarcerated individuals. For prison workers to provide care, custody, and control, they must often perform emotion management strategies to resolve the emotional dissonance of their work, including by dehumanizing the incarcerated people they work with. On the basis of interviews with 22 participants who work inside or in conjunction with prisons, the authors develop the concept of dehumanization spillover to understand how the emotion practice of dehumanization spills outside the relationship with the incarcerated and outside the prison walls to affect prison workers inside and outside of their work role. A classic understanding of dehumanization, as practices that prison workers do to incarcerated individuals, is broadened to encompass workers’ experiences with administrators and coworkers and the negative impacts of prison work on workers’ sense of self and interactions outside of work. This adds to our understanding of dehumanization as an institutional rather than a merely inter-group process.

Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic WorldVol. 11
Kenyon College (US), Westminster College - Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.