Data sources used in bibliometrics 1978–2022: From proprietary databases to the great wide open

Abstract Traditionally, the bibliometric community has relied heavily on secondary data sources, most prominently the Science Citation Index. By analyzing three key journals, we detected trends in the data sources used over a 45‐year period (1978–2022). The historical analysis of data sources reveals a consistency in the materials used as well as bursts of new materials and approaches. On a larger scale, the pattern is stable with Web of Science and Scopus dominating, but this might be about to change. The complexity of the research performed in bibliometrics does not seem to increase as a vast majority of studies use one or two types of data sources despite the increasing availability of data. A more detailed analysis detects trends in the use of data, as represented by patent analyses in the 1980s, webometrics in the late 1990s, and altmetrics in the 2010s. Overall, the paper provides an analytical overview of current and historical data sources used in bibliometrics, which may guide and inspire further research. The question remaining, however, is how the current emphasis on open sources will transform the field in the future: are we entering the great wide open, or will established proprietary databases remain a dominating source?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.25018
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Web visibility and informetrics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data sources used in bibliometrics 1978–2022: From proprietary databases to the great wide open

Alysson Mazoni, Björn Hammarfelt, Camilla Lindelöw
2 citations
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Web visibility and informetrics
6.49
article

Data sources used in bibliometrics 1978–2022: From proprietary databases to the great wide open

Alysson Mazoni, Björn Hammarfelt, Camilla Lindelöw
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Traditionally, the bibliometric community has relied heavily on secondary data sources, most prominently the Science Citation Index. By analyzing three key journals, we detected trends in the data sources used over a 45‐year period (1978–2022). The historical analysis of data sources reveals a consistency in the materials used as well as bursts of new materials and approaches. On a larger scale, the pattern is stable with Web of Science and Scopus dominating, but this might be about to change. The complexity of the research performed in bibliometrics does not seem to increase as a vast majority of studies use one or two types of data sources despite the increasing availability of data. A more detailed analysis detects trends in the use of data, as represented by patent analyses in the 1980s, webometrics in the late 1990s, and altmetrics in the 2010s. Overall, the paper provides an analytical overview of current and historical data sources used in bibliometrics, which may guide and inspire further research. The question remaining, however, is how the current emphasis on open sources will transform the field in the future: are we entering the great wide open, or will established proprietary databases remain a dominating source?

Journal of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 76(9)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), University of Borås (SE)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Web visibility and informetrics
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.