State Courts, Public Opinion, and the Changing Abortion Landscape after <i>Dobbs</i>

The June 24, 2022 Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization represented a seismic shift in abortion policy in the United States. Since then, state courts have begun playing an integral role in expanding or restricting abortion access in their jurisdictions. What do these cases look like and how does the public respond to court decisions that are pro- or anti-abortion? We collect original data on state court abortion cases post- Dobbs and field two survey experiments pre- and post- Dobbs to investigate these questions. We find state courts have expanded their scope in abortion policy and that pro-abortion court decisions are consistently popular. Anti-abortion court decisions, however, are increasingly unpopular. Our paper suggests that state courts are a new vital venue for abortion policymaking and that the public is growing frustrated with the countermajoritarian tendencies of courts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Politics Research
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x251343039
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

State Courts, Public Opinion, and the Changing Abortion Landscape after Dobbs

Nichole M. Bauer, Anna Gunderson, Jeong Hyun Kim, Chesani Askew
1 links
American Politics Research
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

State Courts, Public Opinion, and the Changing Abortion Landscape after Dobbs

Nichole M. Bauer, Anna Gunderson, Jeong Hyun Kim, Chesani Askew
article en

Abstract

The June 24, 2022 Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization represented a seismic shift in abortion policy in the United States. Since then, state courts have begun playing an integral role in expanding or restricting abortion access in their jurisdictions. What do these cases look like and how does the public respond to court decisions that are pro- or anti-abortion? We collect original data on state court abortion cases post- Dobbs and field two survey experiments pre- and post- Dobbs to investigate these questions. We find state courts have expanded their scope in abortion policy and that pro-abortion court decisions are consistently popular. Anti-abortion court decisions, however, are increasingly unpopular. Our paper suggests that state courts are a new vital venue for abortion policymaking and that the public is growing frustrated with the countermajoritarian tendencies of courts.

American Politics ResearchVol. 53(6)
Louisiana State University (US), Yonsei University (KR), Vanderbilt University (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Louisiana Board of Regents
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

State Courts, Public Opinion, and the Changing Abortion Landscape after <i>Dobbs</i> — Nichole M. Bauer, Anna Gunderson, et al. · American Politics Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS