Objective Detection of Auditory Steady-State Responses (ASSRs) Based on Mutual Information: Receiver Operating Characteristics and Performance Across Modulation Rates and Levels

<b>Background</b>: Auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) are sustained potentials used to assess the physiological integrity of the auditory pathway and objectively estimate hearing thresholds. ASSRs are typically analyzed using statistical procedures to remove the subjective bias of human operators. Knowing when to terminate signal averaging in ASSR testing is critical for making efficient clinical decisions and obtaining high-quality data in empirical research. Here, we report on stimulus-specific (frequency, level) properties and operating ranges of a novel ASSR detection metric based on mutual information (MI). <b>Methods</b>: ASSRs were measured in <i>n</i> = 10 normal-hearing listeners exposed to various stimuli varying in modulation rate (40, 80 Hz) and level (80-20 dB SPL). <b>Results</b>: MI-based classifiers applied to ASSR recordings showed that the accuracy of ASSR detection ranged from ~75 to 99% and was better for 40 compared to 80 Hz responses and for higher compared to lower stimulus levels. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) were used to establish normative ranges for MI for reliable ASSR detection across levels and rates (MI = 0.9-1.6). Relative to current statistics for ASSR identification (F-test), MI was a more efficient metric for determining the stopping criterion for signal averaging. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our results confirm that MI can be applied across a broad range of ASSR stimuli and might offer improvements to conventional objective techniques for ASSR detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Audiology Research
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres15030060
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Objective Detection of Auditory Steady-State Responses (ASSRs) Based on Mutual Information: Receiver Operating Characteristics and Performance Across Modulation Rates and Levels

Gavin M. Bidelman, Christen L. Horn
1 citations
Audiology Research
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.43
article

Objective Detection of Auditory Steady-State Responses (ASSRs) Based on Mutual Information: Receiver Operating Characteristics and Performance Across Modulation Rates and Levels

Gavin M. Bidelman, Christen L. Horn
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) are sustained potentials used to assess the physiological integrity of the auditory pathway and objectively estimate hearing thresholds. ASSRs are typically analyzed using statistical procedures to remove the subjective bias of human operators. Knowing when to terminate signal averaging in ASSR testing is critical for making efficient clinical decisions and obtaining high-quality data in empirical research. Here, we report on stimulus-specific (frequency, level) properties and operating ranges of a novel ASSR detection metric based on mutual information (MI). <b>Methods</b>: ASSRs were measured in <i>n</i> = 10 normal-hearing listeners exposed to various stimuli varying in modulation rate (40, 80 Hz) and level (80-20 dB SPL). <b>Results</b>: MI-based classifiers applied to ASSR recordings showed that the accuracy of ASSR detection ranged from ~75 to 99% and was better for 40 compared to 80 Hz responses and for higher compared to lower stimulus levels. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) were used to establish normative ranges for MI for reliable ASSR detection across levels and rates (MI = 0.9-1.6). Relative to current statistics for ASSR identification (F-test), MI was a more efficient metric for determining the stopping criterion for signal averaging. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our results confirm that MI can be applied across a broad range of ASSR stimuli and might offer improvements to conventional objective techniques for ASSR detection.

Audiology ResearchVol. 15(3)
Indiana University Bloomington (US), University of Memphis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.