Comparison of Chemistry and Physics Test Questions in the 2019-2023 Higher Education Institutions Entrance Exams in Terms of Content Validity

In the study, a total of 100 questions from the physics test in the Basic Proficiency Test (TYT) and Field Proficiency Tests (AYT) of the Higher Education Entrance Examinations (YKS) between 2019-2023 were analyzed within the framework of the 2018 Secondary Education Physics Curriculum (MoNE, 2018). The findings were carefully compared with the results of previous studies by Gacanoğlu (2024), Gacanoğlu and Nakiboğlu (2022), and Gacanoğlu and Nakiboğlu (2024) In the first part of analysis, it was found that, among the 213 learning achievements outlined in the 2018 physics curriculum, most questions were derived from the"Force and Motion" unit of the 9th-and 11th-grades. This indicated a lack of homogeneity in the distribution of questions across TYT and AYT physics tests. Nevertheless, it was ultimately concluded that the content validity of the YKS physics test questions was generally preserved, as questions addressed learning achievements from curriculum units. In the second part of the study, the content validity of the YKS physics and chemistry test questions was compared based on curriculum alignment. Although the chemistry test contained the highest number of achievement-based questions, its content validity was lower than that of the physics test due to the lack of questions on certain topics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Academic Research
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1474789
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education Practices and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Chemistry and Physics Test Questions in the 2019-2023 Higher Education Institutions Entrance Exams in Terms of Content Validity

Şengül Sarıkaya Gacanoğlu
1 citations
Educational Academic Research
Education Practices and Challenges
17.27
article

Comparison of Chemistry and Physics Test Questions in the 2019-2023 Higher Education Institutions Entrance Exams in Terms of Content Validity

Şengül Sarıkaya Gacanoğlu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the study, a total of 100 questions from the physics test in the Basic Proficiency Test (TYT) and Field Proficiency Tests (AYT) of the Higher Education Entrance Examinations (YKS) between 2019-2023 were analyzed within the framework of the 2018 Secondary Education Physics Curriculum (MoNE, 2018). The findings were carefully compared with the results of previous studies by Gacanoğlu (2024), Gacanoğlu and Nakiboğlu (2022), and Gacanoğlu and Nakiboğlu (2024) In the first part of analysis, it was found that, among the 213 learning achievements outlined in the 2018 physics curriculum, most questions were derived from the"Force and Motion" unit of the 9th-and 11th-grades. This indicated a lack of homogeneity in the distribution of questions across TYT and AYT physics tests. Nevertheless, it was ultimately concluded that the content validity of the YKS physics test questions was generally preserved, as questions addressed learning achievements from curriculum units. In the second part of the study, the content validity of the YKS physics and chemistry test questions was compared based on curriculum alignment. Although the chemistry test contained the highest number of achievement-based questions, its content validity was lower than that of the physics test due to the lack of questions on certain topics.

Educational Academic Research(57)
Balıkesir University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Education Practices and Challenges
17.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.