Can gestures speak louder than words? The effect of gestural discourse markers on discourse expectations

Much of the research on discourse marking has focused on written text, thereby not considering signals available in the multimodal domain. It is therefore an open question to what extent comprehenders rely on nonlexical discourse signals, such as gestural discourse markers. We conducted a multimodal continuation study: 48 participants were presented with videos of a speaker narrating short stories including a contrast, a list, or an exception relation. In one condition, the target discourse relation was accompanied by a gestural discourse marker; in another condition it was not. The sound was cut out at the second relational argument, and participants were asked to provide a likely continuation. The results showed that comprehenders can infer discourse meaning from gestures, but gestural signals are not as strong as lexical connectives have been found to be. These findings contribute to our understanding of how people can achieve successful comprehension in multimodal communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discourse Processes
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2025.2499414
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can gestures speak louder than words? The effect of gestural discourse markers on discourse expectations

Schuyler Laparle, Merel Scholman
2 citations
Discourse Processes
Hearing Impairment and Communication
6.89
article

Can gestures speak louder than words? The effect of gestural discourse markers on discourse expectations

Schuyler Laparle, Merel Scholman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Much of the research on discourse marking has focused on written text, thereby not considering signals available in the multimodal domain. It is therefore an open question to what extent comprehenders rely on nonlexical discourse signals, such as gestural discourse markers. We conducted a multimodal continuation study: 48 participants were presented with videos of a speaker narrating short stories including a contrast, a list, or an exception relation. In one condition, the target discourse relation was accompanied by a gestural discourse marker; in another condition it was not. The sound was cut out at the second relational argument, and participants were asked to provide a likely continuation. The results showed that comprehenders can infer discourse meaning from gestures, but gestural signals are not as strong as lexical connectives have been found to be. These findings contribute to our understanding of how people can achieve successful comprehension in multimodal communication.

Discourse ProcessesVol. 62(6-7)
Utrecht University (NL), Tilburg University (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
6.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can gestures speak louder than words? The effect of gestural discourse markers on discourse expectations — Schuyler Laparle, Merel Scholman · Discourse Processes (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS