When are global fashion companies socially irresponsible? Relations among misleading information, brand betrayal and saving face in consumer boycotts

Purpose Prior studies have largely ignored how misleading information in corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) influences consumer boycotts. To bridge this gap in the literature, this study empirically investigates and extends the link between misleading information-led CSI and consumer boycotts, focusing on corporate brand betrayal and the personality trait of saving face. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on a sample of 725 Chinese consumers and the Xinjiang cotton incident, we test our hypotheses with the PROCESS macro to evaluate the moderated mediation effect. Findings Our key findings suggest the amplifying effect of a collectivist culture’s saving face on the indirect connection between misleading information-led CSI and consumer boycott via corporate brand betrayal. Originality/value By first proposing and validating the concept of misleading information-led CSI, this study provides insights into the consumer behavior of firm boycotts by highlighting how consumer emotions related to brand betrayal and the personality trait of saving face are associated with misleading information-led CSI.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management
Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmm-08-2024-0337
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When are global fashion companies socially irresponsible? Relations among misleading information, brand betrayal and saving face in consumer boycotts

Ping Zhong, Changju Kim
2 citations
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
4.15
article

When are global fashion companies socially irresponsible? Relations among misleading information, brand betrayal and saving face in consumer boycotts

Ping Zhong, Changju Kim
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose Prior studies have largely ignored how misleading information in corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) influences consumer boycotts. To bridge this gap in the literature, this study empirically investigates and extends the link between misleading information-led CSI and consumer boycotts, focusing on corporate brand betrayal and the personality trait of saving face. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on a sample of 725 Chinese consumers and the Xinjiang cotton incident, we test our hypotheses with the PROCESS macro to evaluate the moderated mediation effect. Findings Our key findings suggest the amplifying effect of a collectivist culture’s saving face on the indirect connection between misleading information-led CSI and consumer boycott via corporate brand betrayal. Originality/value By first proposing and validating the concept of misleading information-led CSI, this study provides insights into the consumer behavior of firm boycotts by highlighting how consumer emotions related to brand betrayal and the personality trait of saving face are associated with misleading information-led CSI.

Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
4.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.