The Impact of Non‐Market Strategic Integration on Green Innovation: The Moderating Effect of Shareholding Structure

ABSTRACT The effects of non‐market strategic integration are a common concern in both theory and practice. We integrate two non‐market strategies, namely corporate philanthropy in corporate social responsibility and political connection in corporate political activities, and meticulously explore in depth the impact of non‐market strategic integration on green innovation using data from Chinese listed firms from 2011 to 2020 based on the principal‐agent theory. We find that two types of non‐market strategic integration, corporate philanthropy in corporate social responsibility and political connections in corporate political activities, negatively affect corporate green innovation because of the emergence of managerial agency problems. Further investigation into the moderating effect of shareholding structures indicates that both cross‐shareholding and multiple large shareholders can alleviate the negative impact of non‐market strategic integration on corporate green innovation. These findings complement the research on the relationship between non‐market strategic integration and value creation by the firm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12833
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Non‐Market Strategic Integration on Green Innovation: The Moderating Effect of Shareholding Structure

Yejing Chen, Yu Xia, Rong Ran, Jie Zhang et al.
Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

The Impact of Non‐Market Strategic Integration on Green Innovation: The Moderating Effect of Shareholding Structure

Yejing Chen, Yu Xia, Rong Ran, Jie Zhang, Xiaoran Yang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The effects of non‐market strategic integration are a common concern in both theory and practice. We integrate two non‐market strategies, namely corporate philanthropy in corporate social responsibility and political connection in corporate political activities, and meticulously explore in depth the impact of non‐market strategic integration on green innovation using data from Chinese listed firms from 2011 to 2020 based on the principal‐agent theory. We find that two types of non‐market strategic integration, corporate philanthropy in corporate social responsibility and political connections in corporate political activities, negatively affect corporate green innovation because of the emergence of managerial agency problems. Further investigation into the moderating effect of shareholding structures indicates that both cross‐shareholding and multiple large shareholders can alleviate the negative impact of non‐market strategic integration on corporate green innovation. These findings complement the research on the relationship between non‐market strategic integration and value creation by the firm.

Business Ethics the Environment & ResponsibilityVol. 35(2)
Chongqing University (CN), China Agricultural University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Central University Basic Research Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.