Assessment of Particulate Matter Emissions from Tobacco Products

Abstract Background Particulate emissions from tobacco products vary significantly between product types. Understanding the nature and quantity of these emissions is important for health risk assessments. This study investigates the mainstream particulate matter emissions from tobacco products, comparing conventional cigarettes (CCs) and heated tobacco products (HTPs). Objective To characterise and compare the nature of aerosols emitted by CCs and HTPs in real time and online. Methods A volatile particle removal system, combining a thermo-dilution setup with an advanced catalytic stripper, was employed to separate and analyse total particulate emissions (including both solid and liquid phases) and the solid-only fraction. Particle number and mass concentrations, size distributions, and physical states of the emitted particulate matter were evaluated. Results The results demonstrate that HTPs emit considerably fewer particles than CCs, with HTP aerosols comprising liquid droplets, whereas CC smoke consists of both liquid and solid particles. Conclusions The findings provide critical insights into the composition and physical form of tobacco emissions, contributing to a better understanding of the differences between CC smoke and HTP aerosols and their potential health impacts. Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44408-025-00011-3
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Particulate Matter Emissions from Tobacco Products

George Karagiannakis, Dimitrios Zarvalis, Penelope Baltzopoulou, Leonidas Chasapidis et al.
3 citations
Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Air Quality and Health Impacts
3.60
article

Assessment of Particulate Matter Emissions from Tobacco Products

George Karagiannakis, Dimitrios Zarvalis, Penelope Baltzopoulou, Leonidas Chasapidis, Emmanouil Daskalos, Daniel Deloglou, Eleni Papaioannou
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Particulate emissions from tobacco products vary significantly between product types. Understanding the nature and quantity of these emissions is important for health risk assessments. This study investigates the mainstream particulate matter emissions from tobacco products, comparing conventional cigarettes (CCs) and heated tobacco products (HTPs). Objective To characterise and compare the nature of aerosols emitted by CCs and HTPs in real time and online. Methods A volatile particle removal system, combining a thermo-dilution setup with an advanced catalytic stripper, was employed to separate and analyse total particulate emissions (including both solid and liquid phases) and the solid-only fraction. Particle number and mass concentrations, size distributions, and physical states of the emitted particulate matter were evaluated. Results The results demonstrate that HTPs emit considerably fewer particles than CCs, with HTP aerosols comprising liquid droplets, whereas CC smoke consists of both liquid and solid particles. Conclusions The findings provide critical insights into the composition and physical form of tobacco emissions, contributing to a better understanding of the differences between CC smoke and HTP aerosols and their potential health impacts. Graphical Abstract

Aerosol and Air Quality ResearchVol. 25(6)
Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
3.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.