“Tired of being treated like broken glass to tip-toe around”: Uncovering ableism through PWDs’ voices on social media

Despite the implementation of ad hoc equality policies and the positive actions taken by organizations (European Commission, 2021; Council of Europe, 2016, 2017), the living conditions of people with disabilities (PWDs) remain a pressing concern. Discrimination against PWDs endures due to persistent stereotypes and prejudicial attitudes, which prevent them from fully participating in societal activities. Social Media Sites (SMSs) have been identified as active spaces for hate speech online (HSO) (Balirano & Hughes, 2020, 2024; Hughes & Nisco, 2022a; Matamoros-Fernández & Farkas, 2021; Wanniarachchi et al., 2023), as individuals often hide behind fake accounts to spread their derogatory viewpoints. However, these platforms also serve as gathering places where people with similar experiences can share their opinions, feelings, and emotions (Raffone, 2022b). As (digital) disability discourse is still under-researched in Critical Discourse Studies (CDS) (Grue, 2011; Raffone, 2022a), this paper, guided by the principles of Corpus Linguistics (CL) (Baker et al., 2008; Baker, 2012a, 2012b), Critical Discourse Studies (CDS) (Fairclough, 1989; Van Dijk, 1998, 2005, 2008, 2011, 2012, 2014), and Social Media Critical Discourse Studies (SM-CDS) (Döveling et al., 2018; KhosraviNik, 2010, 2017, 2020, 2023; KhosraviNik & Unger, 2016; KhosraviNik & Esposito, 2018), will explore PWDs’ digitally-mediated discourse to shed light on the persistence of ableism and how disabled individuals discursively attempt to resist and challenge pre-existing hateful and discriminatory attitudes in social media spaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical approaches to discourse analysis across disciplines
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21827/cadaad.17.1.42443
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Tired of being treated like broken glass to tip-toe around”: Uncovering ableism through PWDs’ voices on social media

Annalisa Raffone
Critical approaches to discourse analysis across disciplines
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

“Tired of being treated like broken glass to tip-toe around”: Uncovering ableism through PWDs’ voices on social media

Annalisa Raffone
article en

Abstract

Despite the implementation of ad hoc equality policies and the positive actions taken by organizations (European Commission, 2021; Council of Europe, 2016, 2017), the living conditions of people with disabilities (PWDs) remain a pressing concern. Discrimination against PWDs endures due to persistent stereotypes and prejudicial attitudes, which prevent them from fully participating in societal activities. Social Media Sites (SMSs) have been identified as active spaces for hate speech online (HSO) (Balirano & Hughes, 2020, 2024; Hughes & Nisco, 2022a; Matamoros-Fernández & Farkas, 2021; Wanniarachchi et al., 2023), as individuals often hide behind fake accounts to spread their derogatory viewpoints. However, these platforms also serve as gathering places where people with similar experiences can share their opinions, feelings, and emotions (Raffone, 2022b). As (digital) disability discourse is still under-researched in Critical Discourse Studies (CDS) (Grue, 2011; Raffone, 2022a), this paper, guided by the principles of Corpus Linguistics (CL) (Baker et al., 2008; Baker, 2012a, 2012b), Critical Discourse Studies (CDS) (Fairclough, 1989; Van Dijk, 1998, 2005, 2008, 2011, 2012, 2014), and Social Media Critical Discourse Studies (SM-CDS) (Döveling et al., 2018; KhosraviNik, 2010, 2017, 2020, 2023; KhosraviNik & Unger, 2016; KhosraviNik & Esposito, 2018), will explore PWDs’ digitally-mediated discourse to shed light on the persistence of ableism and how disabled individuals discursively attempt to resist and challenge pre-existing hateful and discriminatory attitudes in social media spaces.

Critical approaches to discourse analysis across disciplinesVol. 17(1)
Pegaso University (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.