Diskursus Tafsir Teologis Ulama Nusantara dan Transnasional (Studi Kritis Tafsir Asy’ariyyah dan Wahabi di Indonesia)

This study discusses the theological conflict arising from interpretational differences between Nusantara Ulama and Transnational Ulama in Indonesia. The researcher analyzes the paradigms and mainstream interpretations of the two Islamic typologies that have developed in Indonesia, namely Nusantara Ulama and Transnational Ulama. The author also seeks to identify points of difference and initiate an integrative effort to minimize existing tensions. Using a qualitative approach with library research as the primary reference and employing a comparative tafsir method as an analytical tool, this study also adopts the approach of ilm al-kalam (theology). The research findings indicate that the Nusantara Ulama paradigm tends to use a contextual paradigm with a mainstream interpretation of substantialist tafsir, while the Transnational Ulama uses a textual paradigm with a mainstream interpretation of scripturalist tafsir. These differences in paradigm and mainstream interpretation often lead to misunderstandings, even accusations of heresy or disbelief towards each other, despite the essential similarities in their views. To minimize ideological conflict regarding the interpretation of theological verses, the author proposes an integrative approach through convergent interpretation (tafsīr mutaqāribah). This approach represents a compromise between substantialist and scripturalist tafsir. This tafsir model offers a peaceful way to reach a mutual agreement that both sides can accept. The interpretation focuses on the core teachings of the Qur'an concerning theological verses, with consideration for maslahat (public interest), by finding common ground amidst the various interpretations. This approach requires mufassirs to socialize the meaning of theological verses to the Muslim community. Mufassirs need to re-recognize the primary purpose of the Qur'an's revelation to Prophet Muhammad, which is to bring a mission of peace, while also reconciling diverse opinions with a firm adherence to the essential theological teachings of Islam and upholding the Qur'an and Sunnah.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Al Furqan Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58518/alfurqon.v7i2.2886
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diskursus Tafsir Teologis Ulama Nusantara dan Transnasional (Studi Kritis Tafsir Asy’ariyyah dan Wahabi di Indonesia)

Khozinul Alim, Muhammad Darwis Hude, Arrazy Hasyim
Al Furqan Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
article

Diskursus Tafsir Teologis Ulama Nusantara dan Transnasional (Studi Kritis Tafsir Asy’ariyyah dan Wahabi di Indonesia)

Khozinul Alim, Muhammad Darwis Hude, Arrazy Hasyim
article en

Abstract

This study discusses the theological conflict arising from interpretational differences between Nusantara Ulama and Transnational Ulama in Indonesia. The researcher analyzes the paradigms and mainstream interpretations of the two Islamic typologies that have developed in Indonesia, namely Nusantara Ulama and Transnational Ulama. The author also seeks to identify points of difference and initiate an integrative effort to minimize existing tensions. Using a qualitative approach with library research as the primary reference and employing a comparative tafsir method as an analytical tool, this study also adopts the approach of ilm al-kalam (theology). The research findings indicate that the Nusantara Ulama paradigm tends to use a contextual paradigm with a mainstream interpretation of substantialist tafsir, while the Transnational Ulama uses a textual paradigm with a mainstream interpretation of scripturalist tafsir. These differences in paradigm and mainstream interpretation often lead to misunderstandings, even accusations of heresy or disbelief towards each other, despite the essential similarities in their views. To minimize ideological conflict regarding the interpretation of theological verses, the author proposes an integrative approach through convergent interpretation (tafsīr mutaqāribah). This approach represents a compromise between substantialist and scripturalist tafsir. This tafsir model offers a peaceful way to reach a mutual agreement that both sides can accept. The interpretation focuses on the core teachings of the Qur'an concerning theological verses, with consideration for maslahat (public interest), by finding common ground amidst the various interpretations. This approach requires mufassirs to socialize the meaning of theological verses to the Muslim community. Mufassirs need to re-recognize the primary purpose of the Qur'an's revelation to Prophet Muhammad, which is to bring a mission of peace, while also reconciling diverse opinions with a firm adherence to the essential theological teachings of Islam and upholding the Qur'an and Sunnah.

Al Furqan Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan TafsirVol. 7(2)
Universitas Sains Al-Qur'an (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.