Evaluation of Ground Motion Models for Volcanic Areas in Italy: Advancing ShakeMap Implementation

In Italy, volcanic earthquakes are crucial for assessing seismic hazard, as several volcanoes pose significant risks to densely populated areas (e.g., Catania and its surroundings, Phlegraean Fields, Vesuvius). Recently, the increase in seismic activity in the Phlegraean Fields, characterized by swarms of low-magnitude earthquakes concomitant with bradyseism, has prompted a revision of the configuration of the Ground Motion Models (GMMs) used in the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) ShakeMap software implemented in Italy for volcanic areas. In this study, we applied a cross-validation technique to evaluate the effectiveness of various GMMs available in the literature for volcanic regions, aiming to the identification of the most appropriate configuration to update and improve the ShakeMap service provided by the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV). We compared the performance of the currently adopted GMMs [a combination of Tusa and Langer (2016) for earthquakes down to 5 km depth and Bindi et al. (2010) for deeper earthquakes] in predicting ground shaking with those developed by Tusa et al. (2020) and Lanzano and Luzi (2020). To conduct the tests, we used 100 Italian earthquakes that occurred in volcanic areas between February 2019 and May 2024, with magnitudes in the range 3.0‑4.5 and depths ≤ 35 km. Among the tested models, the GMM proposed by Tusa et al. (2020) was found to provide the most accurate predictions and will be adopted for generating the INGV shakemaps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Geophysics
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-9286
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Ground Motion Models for Volcanic Areas in Italy: Advancing ShakeMap Implementation

Licia Faenza, Ilaria Oliveti, Valentino Lauciani, Alberto Michelini
Annals of Geophysics
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Evaluation of Ground Motion Models for Volcanic Areas in Italy: Advancing ShakeMap Implementation

Licia Faenza, Ilaria Oliveti, Valentino Lauciani, Alberto Michelini
article en

Abstract

In Italy, volcanic earthquakes are crucial for assessing seismic hazard, as several volcanoes pose significant risks to densely populated areas (e.g., Catania and its surroundings, Phlegraean Fields, Vesuvius). Recently, the increase in seismic activity in the Phlegraean Fields, characterized by swarms of low-magnitude earthquakes concomitant with bradyseism, has prompted a revision of the configuration of the Ground Motion Models (GMMs) used in the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) ShakeMap software implemented in Italy for volcanic areas. In this study, we applied a cross-validation technique to evaluate the effectiveness of various GMMs available in the literature for volcanic regions, aiming to the identification of the most appropriate configuration to update and improve the ShakeMap service provided by the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV). We compared the performance of the currently adopted GMMs [a combination of Tusa and Langer (2016) for earthquakes down to 5 km depth and Bindi et al. (2010) for deeper earthquakes] in predicting ground shaking with those developed by Tusa et al. (2020) and Lanzano and Luzi (2020). To conduct the tests, we used 100 Italian earthquakes that occurred in volcanic areas between February 2019 and May 2024, with magnitudes in the range 3.0‑4.5 and depths ≤ 35 km. Among the tested models, the GMM proposed by Tusa et al. (2020) was found to provide the most accurate predictions and will be adopted for generating the INGV shakemaps.

Annals of GeophysicsVol. 68(2)
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.