Revisiting the National Institute on Aging (NIA) Health Disparities Research Framework: Recommendations for Aging Research

This paper explores the implications of the National Institute on Aging Health Disparities Research Framework (HDRF) in understanding and addressing health disparities in aging populations. The framework provides a comprehensive lens through which researchers examine the intersection of biological, social, behavioral, and environmental factors that influence health outcomes and contribute to disparities among older adults. By focusing on vulnerable and underserved populations, the HDRF allows for multilevel analyses of socioeconomic status, education, and living conditions that affect health and social mobility. A review of key studies using the HDRF highlights the complexity of health disparities, particularly concerning race, ethnicity, and environmental exposures. It underscores the need for inclusive, culturally relevant research. The paper further emphasizes the importance of enhancing the HDRF to incorporate evolving social determinants of health, including digital health disparities, and recommends integrating belonging as a foundational concept to ensure historically marginalized populations are represented and actively engaged in research. By advocating for longitudinal, community-based research and policy development, this work calls for a concerted effort to eliminate structural and social barriers to health equity, aiming to advance social justice and inclusion in aging science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Gerontologist
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf097
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the National Institute on Aging (NIA) Health Disparities Research Framework: Recommendations for Aging Research

Roland J. Thorpe, Carl V. Hill, Lauren Parker
2 citations
The Gerontologist
Health disparities and outcomes
4.33
article

Revisiting the National Institute on Aging (NIA) Health Disparities Research Framework: Recommendations for Aging Research

Roland J. Thorpe, Carl V. Hill, Lauren Parker
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper explores the implications of the National Institute on Aging Health Disparities Research Framework (HDRF) in understanding and addressing health disparities in aging populations. The framework provides a comprehensive lens through which researchers examine the intersection of biological, social, behavioral, and environmental factors that influence health outcomes and contribute to disparities among older adults. By focusing on vulnerable and underserved populations, the HDRF allows for multilevel analyses of socioeconomic status, education, and living conditions that affect health and social mobility. A review of key studies using the HDRF highlights the complexity of health disparities, particularly concerning race, ethnicity, and environmental exposures. It underscores the need for inclusive, culturally relevant research. The paper further emphasizes the importance of enhancing the HDRF to incorporate evolving social determinants of health, including digital health disparities, and recommends integrating belonging as a foundational concept to ensure historically marginalized populations are represented and actively engaged in research. By advocating for longitudinal, community-based research and policy development, this work calls for a concerted effort to eliminate structural and social barriers to health equity, aiming to advance social justice and inclusion in aging science.

The GerontologistVol. 65(6)
Alzheimer's Association (US), Johns Hopkins University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Health disparities and outcomes
4.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.