Iconoclasts and Iconophiles: Politics of Public Statues in Colonial India, 1880–1947

Iconophilia and iconoclasm have psycho-social parallels throughout history, despite the fact that each civilisation’s historical, sociopolitical and ideological settings have been different. British imperial presence, which peaked in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, a period of imperial ‘statue mania’, led to the employment of statue as an instrument for spatio-memorial hegemony in India. In reaction, the nationalist rhetoric included acts of violent and non-violent iconoclastic responses against the colonial statuary culture. But along with such reaction, reception as well as incorporation of statuary aesthetic culture was also present. This study claims that both iconophilic and iconoclastic psycho-social positions influenced imperial, loyalist and nationalist efforts towards establishing ideological supremacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in People’s History
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23484489251321653
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anthropological Studies and Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Iconoclasts and Iconophiles: Politics of Public Statues in Colonial India, 1880–1947

Aryama Ghosh
1 citations
Studies in People’s History
Anthropological Studies and Insights
11.35
article

Iconoclasts and Iconophiles: Politics of Public Statues in Colonial India, 1880–1947

Aryama Ghosh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Iconophilia and iconoclasm have psycho-social parallels throughout history, despite the fact that each civilisation’s historical, sociopolitical and ideological settings have been different. British imperial presence, which peaked in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, a period of imperial ‘statue mania’, led to the employment of statue as an instrument for spatio-memorial hegemony in India. In reaction, the nationalist rhetoric included acts of violent and non-violent iconoclastic responses against the colonial statuary culture. But along with such reaction, reception as well as incorporation of statuary aesthetic culture was also present. This study claims that both iconophilic and iconoclastic psycho-social positions influenced imperial, loyalist and nationalist efforts towards establishing ideological supremacy.

Studies in People’s HistoryVol. 12(1)
Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Anthropological Studies and Insights
11.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.