Analysis of the risks of complications after metal osteosynthesis for acetabular fractures

Background. Acetabular fractures were and still are a complex, not fully solved problem. Despite the entire modern arsenal of therapeutic measures, these injuries lead to disability in 73–88 % of cases. Objective: to evaluate the time of the hip joint “survival” and to analyze the risks of complications after metal osteosynthesis for acetabular fractures. Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis was performed of the development of complications after metal osteosynthesis in 65 patients with acetabular fractures. The analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier survival function. Comparison of the results of arthroplasty was performed by the xi-square (Cramr’s V). Statistical calculations were done in IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0. Results. There were 3 main stages of complications development. Stage I (n = 46) — rapid development of complications that required hip arthroplasty in the first 2 years after injury. Stage II (n = 12) — complications appeared in the period from 24 months to 10–12 years, which led to joint replacement during this time. Stage III — late manifestations of joint disease with arthroplasty later than in 10 years. Among 54 patients who suffered acetabular fracture, 52 % (28 patients) required hip arthroplasty in the first 2 years after the injury, mainly due to osteosynthesis complications. According to the results of total hip replacement, only 9 (32.1 %) of them had a good treatment outcome, and 6 (21.4 %) reported a poor outcome. Arthroplasty within 10 years after the injury was performed in 18 (33.3 %) patients with early development of hip dege­nerative diseases such as coxarthrosis and/or aseptic necrosis. Only in 8 (14.8 %) patients who underwent arthroplasty in 10 years or later, the results of fracture treatment without replacement can be considered good, and joint arthroplasty can be considered necessary due to age-related changes. Conclusions. The analysis determined that most complications after treatment of acetabular fractures with osteosynthesis occurred in the first 2 years and patients required arthroplasty due to poor joint condition and recurrent dislocation. Only a small proportion of patients, mostly of young age, underwent this treatment with a positive outcome and developed degenerative complications in the long term. The low overall outcome of fracture treatment with osteosynthesis calls for a reassessment of treatment approaches in such injuries, which may include combined hip arthroplasty immediately after injury.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
TRAUMA
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22141/1608-1706.2.26.2025.1004
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of the risks of complications after metal osteosynthesis for acetabular fractures

D.B. Vatamanitsa, Т. В. Козлова, Olenа Karpinska, Stanislav Bondarenko et al.
1 citations
TRAUMA
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
2.01
article

Analysis of the risks of complications after metal osteosynthesis for acetabular fractures

D.B. Vatamanitsa, Т. В. Козлова, Olenа Karpinska, Stanislav Bondarenko, М.Yu. Karpinsky
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background. Acetabular fractures were and still are a complex, not fully solved problem. Despite the entire modern arsenal of therapeutic measures, these injuries lead to disability in 73–88 % of cases. Objective: to evaluate the time of the hip joint “survival” and to analyze the risks of complications after metal osteosynthesis for acetabular fractures. Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis was performed of the development of complications after metal osteosynthesis in 65 patients with acetabular fractures. The analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier survival function. Comparison of the results of arthroplasty was performed by the xi-square (Cramr’s V). Statistical calculations were done in IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0. Results. There were 3 main stages of complications development. Stage I (n = 46) — rapid development of complications that required hip arthroplasty in the first 2 years after injury. Stage II (n = 12) — complications appeared in the period from 24 months to 10–12 years, which led to joint replacement during this time. Stage III — late manifestations of joint disease with arthroplasty later than in 10 years. Among 54 patients who suffered acetabular fracture, 52 % (28 patients) required hip arthroplasty in the first 2 years after the injury, mainly due to osteosynthesis complications. According to the results of total hip replacement, only 9 (32.1 %) of them had a good treatment outcome, and 6 (21.4 %) reported a poor outcome. Arthroplasty within 10 years after the injury was performed in 18 (33.3 %) patients with early development of hip dege­nerative diseases such as coxarthrosis and/or aseptic necrosis. Only in 8 (14.8 %) patients who underwent arthroplasty in 10 years or later, the results of fracture treatment without replacement can be considered good, and joint arthroplasty can be considered necessary due to age-related changes. Conclusions. The analysis determined that most complications after treatment of acetabular fractures with osteosynthesis occurred in the first 2 years and patients required arthroplasty due to poor joint condition and recurrent dislocation. Only a small proportion of patients, mostly of young age, underwent this treatment with a positive outcome and developed degenerative complications in the long term. The low overall outcome of fracture treatment with osteosynthesis calls for a reassessment of treatment approaches in such injuries, which may include combined hip arthroplasty immediately after injury.

TRAUMAVol. 26(2)
Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine (UA), V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.