Defining the Criteria for Selecting the Right Extended Reality Systems in Healthcare Using Fuzzy Analytic Network Process

In the past decade, extended reality (XR) has been introduced into healthcare due to several potential benefits, such as scalability and cost savings. As there is no comprehensive study covering all the factors influencing the selection of an XR system in the healthcare and medical domain, a Decision Support System is proposed in this paper to identify and rank factors impacting the performance of XR in this domain from an engineering design perspective. The proposed system is built upon the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model supported by a literature survey and experts' knowledge to extract and identify important factors. Subsequently, the factors are categorized into distinct categories, and their relative importance is specified by Analytic Network Process (ANP) models under a fuzzy environment. Two fuzzy approaches for the ANP models are compared, and the results are analyzed using statistical testing. The computational results show that the ranking agreement between the two fuzzy approaches is strong and corresponds to the fact that both approaches yield the same ranking of primary factors, highlighting the significance of reliability as the topmost factor, followed by responsiveness, cost, and agility. It is shown that while the top three important sub-factors are identical between the two approaches, their relative order is slightly varied. Safety is considered to be the most critical aspect within the reliability category in both approaches, but there are discrepancies in the rankings of accuracy and user control and freedom. Both approaches also consider warranty and depreciation costs as the least significant criteria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25103133
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Augmented Reality Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining the Criteria for Selecting the Right Extended Reality Systems in Healthcare Using Fuzzy Analytic Network Process

Ali Kamali Mohammadzadeh, Maryam Eghbali‐Zarch, Sara Masoud, Roohollah Jahanmahin
1 citations
Sensors
Augmented Reality Applications
1.28
article

Defining the Criteria for Selecting the Right Extended Reality Systems in Healthcare Using Fuzzy Analytic Network Process

Ali Kamali Mohammadzadeh, Maryam Eghbali‐Zarch, Sara Masoud, Roohollah Jahanmahin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the past decade, extended reality (XR) has been introduced into healthcare due to several potential benefits, such as scalability and cost savings. As there is no comprehensive study covering all the factors influencing the selection of an XR system in the healthcare and medical domain, a Decision Support System is proposed in this paper to identify and rank factors impacting the performance of XR in this domain from an engineering design perspective. The proposed system is built upon the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model supported by a literature survey and experts' knowledge to extract and identify important factors. Subsequently, the factors are categorized into distinct categories, and their relative importance is specified by Analytic Network Process (ANP) models under a fuzzy environment. Two fuzzy approaches for the ANP models are compared, and the results are analyzed using statistical testing. The computational results show that the ranking agreement between the two fuzzy approaches is strong and corresponds to the fact that both approaches yield the same ranking of primary factors, highlighting the significance of reliability as the topmost factor, followed by responsiveness, cost, and agility. It is shown that while the top three important sub-factors are identical between the two approaches, their relative order is slightly varied. Safety is considered to be the most critical aspect within the reliability category in both approaches, but there are discrepancies in the rankings of accuracy and user control and freedom. Both approaches also consider warranty and depreciation costs as the least significant criteria.

SensorsVol. 25(10)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Wayne State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Augmented Reality Applications
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.