How Patients' Lifestyle Affects the Wear of Hip Implants: An In‐Silico Study

The validation of new hip replacement designs traditionally relies on lengthy and costly In-Vitro wear tests that replicate basic In-Vivo conditions, as the simplified walking recommended in the ISO 14242 guidelines. These tests overlook the diverse motor tasks and lifestyle differences among patients. This study seeks to establish the foundation for In-Silico clinical trials of total hip replacements, enabling wear simulations of patients with different lifestyles, not feasible with In-Vitro tests. The impact of diverse kinematic and loading histories on the wear of metal-on-plastic hip replacements is investigated in a novel way, considering the combined effect of six daily activities (e.g., walking, fast walking, sit/stand, stairs up/down, lunging), different activity frequencies across five patient profiles (from sedentary elderly to active young), and the effect of load sequence. The results reveal that both the type and frequency of motor tasks significantly influence implant wear. The most critical tasks and at-risk patients were stair climbing and the most active individuals, regardless of age. Load sequence also plays a key role in long-term wear predictions. Accuracy and computational cost were balanced by simulating walking, stair climbing, and sit/stand cycles, ensuring equivalent wear to a complete motor task sequence. ISO standards conditions notably tend to underestimate volumetric wear by up to 60% compared to the simulated patient types. They also fail to predict realistic wear patterns for activities like squatting and lunging where edge contact occurs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.26098
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Patients' Lifestyle Affects the Wear of Hip Implants: An In‐Silico Study

Lorenza Mattei, Francesca Di Puccio, Andrea Di Pietro
1 citations
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
2.01
article

How Patients' Lifestyle Affects the Wear of Hip Implants: An In‐Silico Study

Lorenza Mattei, Francesca Di Puccio, Andrea Di Pietro
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The validation of new hip replacement designs traditionally relies on lengthy and costly In-Vitro wear tests that replicate basic In-Vivo conditions, as the simplified walking recommended in the ISO 14242 guidelines. These tests overlook the diverse motor tasks and lifestyle differences among patients. This study seeks to establish the foundation for In-Silico clinical trials of total hip replacements, enabling wear simulations of patients with different lifestyles, not feasible with In-Vitro tests. The impact of diverse kinematic and loading histories on the wear of metal-on-plastic hip replacements is investigated in a novel way, considering the combined effect of six daily activities (e.g., walking, fast walking, sit/stand, stairs up/down, lunging), different activity frequencies across five patient profiles (from sedentary elderly to active young), and the effect of load sequence. The results reveal that both the type and frequency of motor tasks significantly influence implant wear. The most critical tasks and at-risk patients were stair climbing and the most active individuals, regardless of age. Load sequence also plays a key role in long-term wear predictions. Accuracy and computational cost were balanced by simulating walking, stair climbing, and sit/stand cycles, ensuring equivalent wear to a complete motor task sequence. ISO standards conditions notably tend to underestimate volumetric wear by up to 60% compared to the simulated patient types. They also fail to predict realistic wear patterns for activities like squatting and lunging where edge contact occurs.

Journal of Orthopaedic Research®Vol. 43(8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.