Bi-Level Resilience-Oriented Sitting and Sizing of Energy Hubs in Electrical, Thermal and Gas Networks Considering Energy Management System

In this article, the planning and energy administration of energy hubs in electric, thermal and gas networks are presented, considering the resilience of the system against natural phenomena like floods and earthquakes. Each hub consists of bio-waste, wind and solar renewable units. These include non-renewable units such as boilers and combined heat and power (CHP) units. Compressed air and thermal energy storage are used in each hub. The design is formed as a bi-level optimization framework. In the upper level of the scheme, the energy management of networks bound to system resiliency is provided. This considers the minimization of annual operating and resilience costs based on optimal power flow equations in networks. In the lower-level model, the planning (placement and sizing) of hubs is considered. This minimizes the total building and operation costs of hubs based on the operation-planning equations for power supplies and storages. Scenario-based stochastic optimization models are used to determine the uncertainties of demand, the power of renewable systems, energy price and the accessibility of distribution networks’ elements against natural disasters. In this study, the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker technique is used to extract the single-level formulation. A numerical report for case studies verifies the potential of the plan to enhance the economic, operation and resilience status of networks with energy administration and the optimal planning of hubs in the mentioned networks. By determining the optimal capacity for resources and storage in the hubs located in the optimal places and the optimal energy administration of the hubs, the economic, exploitation and resilience situation of the networks are improved by about 27.1%, 97.7% and 23–50%, respectively, compared to load flow studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18102569
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bi-Level Resilience-Oriented Sitting and Sizing of Energy Hubs in Electrical, Thermal and Gas Networks Considering Energy Management System

Dhafer M. Dahis, Alireza Saffarian, Mahmood Joorabian, Seyed Saeedallah Mortazavi
1 citations
Energies
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
0.73
article

Bi-Level Resilience-Oriented Sitting and Sizing of Energy Hubs in Electrical, Thermal and Gas Networks Considering Energy Management System

Dhafer M. Dahis, Alireza Saffarian, Mahmood Joorabian, Seyed Saeedallah Mortazavi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this article, the planning and energy administration of energy hubs in electric, thermal and gas networks are presented, considering the resilience of the system against natural phenomena like floods and earthquakes. Each hub consists of bio-waste, wind and solar renewable units. These include non-renewable units such as boilers and combined heat and power (CHP) units. Compressed air and thermal energy storage are used in each hub. The design is formed as a bi-level optimization framework. In the upper level of the scheme, the energy management of networks bound to system resiliency is provided. This considers the minimization of annual operating and resilience costs based on optimal power flow equations in networks. In the lower-level model, the planning (placement and sizing) of hubs is considered. This minimizes the total building and operation costs of hubs based on the operation-planning equations for power supplies and storages. Scenario-based stochastic optimization models are used to determine the uncertainties of demand, the power of renewable systems, energy price and the accessibility of distribution networks’ elements against natural disasters. In this study, the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker technique is used to extract the single-level formulation. A numerical report for case studies verifies the potential of the plan to enhance the economic, operation and resilience status of networks with energy administration and the optimal planning of hubs in the mentioned networks. By determining the optimal capacity for resources and storage in the hubs located in the optimal places and the optimal energy administration of the hubs, the economic, exploitation and resilience situation of the networks are improved by about 27.1%, 97.7% and 23–50%, respectively, compared to load flow studies.

EnergiesVol. 18(10)
Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.