Questioning the Concepts of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and Industry 4.0 When Describing Modernization as a Sequential Framework

This study analyzes existing concepts used to describe process modernization, including industrial revolutions and Industry 3.0, Industry 4.0, and Industry 5.0, here collectively referred to as the Sequential Industrial Modernization Framework. A simple industrial scenario was considered to evaluate whether current conceptual foundations could answer key questions regarding process classification and technological definitions. Surprisingly, the findings revealed that the industrial revolutions and Industry 3.0, Industry 4.0, and Industry 5.0 concepts fail to provide consistent answers, as different authors assign varying dates and technologies to each stage without offering clear definitions and explanations. These results highlight the need to critically reassess and improve the theoretical foundations to enhance the internal coherence, reproducibility, and applicability of the concepts in the scientific literature to describe modernization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104531
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Industry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Questioning the Concepts of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and Industry 4.0 When Describing Modernization as a Sequential Framework

Claudio Alarcón, Sofía Alarcón García
3 citations
Sustainability
Digital Transformation in Industry
3.73
article

Questioning the Concepts of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and Industry 4.0 When Describing Modernization as a Sequential Framework

Claudio Alarcón, Sofía Alarcón García
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study analyzes existing concepts used to describe process modernization, including industrial revolutions and Industry 3.0, Industry 4.0, and Industry 5.0, here collectively referred to as the Sequential Industrial Modernization Framework. A simple industrial scenario was considered to evaluate whether current conceptual foundations could answer key questions regarding process classification and technological definitions. Surprisingly, the findings revealed that the industrial revolutions and Industry 3.0, Industry 4.0, and Industry 5.0 concepts fail to provide consistent answers, as different authors assign varying dates and technologies to each stage without offering clear definitions and explanations. These results highlight the need to critically reassess and improve the theoretical foundations to enhance the internal coherence, reproducibility, and applicability of the concepts in the scientific literature to describe modernization.

SustainabilityVol. 17(10)
Universidad de La Frontera (CL), Universidad Católica de Temuco (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Digital Transformation in Industry
3.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.