Exploring the Potential for Large Language Models to Demonstrate Rational Probabilistic Beliefs

Advances in the general capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have led to their use for information retrieval, and as components in automated decision systems. A faithful representation of probabilistic reasoning in these models may be essential to ensure trustworthy, explainable and effective performance in these tasks. Despite previous work suggesting that LLMs can perform complex reasoning and well-calibrated uncertainty quantification, we find that current versions of this class of model lack the ability to provide rational and coherent representations of probabilistic beliefs. To demonstrate this, we introduce a novel dataset of claims with indeterminate truth values and apply a number of well-established techniques for uncertainty quantification to measure the ability of LLM's to adhere to fundamental properties of probabilistic reasoning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ... International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32473/flairs.38.1.138892
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.89

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Potential for Large Language Models to Demonstrate Rational Probabilistic Beliefs

Gabriel Freedman, Francesca Toni
1 citations
Proceedings of the ... International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
0.89
article

Exploring the Potential for Large Language Models to Demonstrate Rational Probabilistic Beliefs

Gabriel Freedman, Francesca Toni
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Advances in the general capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have led to their use for information retrieval, and as components in automated decision systems. A faithful representation of probabilistic reasoning in these models may be essential to ensure trustworthy, explainable and effective performance in these tasks. Despite previous work suggesting that LLMs can perform complex reasoning and well-calibrated uncertainty quantification, we find that current versions of this class of model lack the ability to provide rational and coherent representations of probabilistic beliefs. To demonstrate this, we introduce a novel dataset of claims with indeterminate truth values and apply a number of well-established techniques for uncertainty quantification to measure the ability of LLM's to adhere to fundamental properties of probabilistic reasoning.

Proceedings of the ... International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society ConferenceVol. 38
Imperial College London (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Royal Academy of Engineering
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
0.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.