Comparison of Doppler sampling locations in the umbilical artery for detecting fetal growth restriction

Abstract Objectives The objectives of study were to determine the most reliable umbilical artery (UA) Doppler sampling location for detecting fetal growth restriction (FGR) and compare indices between growth-restricted and adequate for gestational age (AGA) fetuses. Methods UA Doppler was done in 55 pregnant women with FGR and 120 with AGA and indices were recorded at three locations including fetal end, free-floating portion (FFL) and placental end (PE). Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analysis was performed to find out the accuracy of the Doppler indices for detecting FGR. Measurements at three portions of UA were compared with each other using repeated measures ANOVA in normal pregnancies. Results The sensitivity for differentiating AGA from FGR using pulsatility index (PI) was the same (94.5%) at all three locations. The specificity was highest at fetal end (FE) using PI values (99.2%) as well as for systolic to diastolic (S/D) ratio (100%). Likewise, sensitivity and specificity both were highest (89.1% and 99.2% respectively) at FE when resistive index (RI) was used for this differentiation. Conclusion Although UA Doppler is a well-known non-invasive method used for investigating fetoplacental circulation, indices taken at fetal-end of UA are more reliable in diagnosing cases of FGR which might be due to it being a fixed site.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Imaging
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1556/1647.2025.00288
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Doppler sampling locations in the umbilical artery for detecting fetal growth restriction

Muhammad Zakir, Javed Tauqir, Noraiz Ali, Mahrukh Latif et al.
Imaging
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

Comparison of Doppler sampling locations in the umbilical artery for detecting fetal growth restriction

Muhammad Zakir, Javed Tauqir, Noraiz Ali, Mahrukh Latif, Zareen Fatima, Sabar Butt, Zeeshan Haider, Rafia Sadiq
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The objectives of study were to determine the most reliable umbilical artery (UA) Doppler sampling location for detecting fetal growth restriction (FGR) and compare indices between growth-restricted and adequate for gestational age (AGA) fetuses. Methods UA Doppler was done in 55 pregnant women with FGR and 120 with AGA and indices were recorded at three locations including fetal end, free-floating portion (FFL) and placental end (PE). Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analysis was performed to find out the accuracy of the Doppler indices for detecting FGR. Measurements at three portions of UA were compared with each other using repeated measures ANOVA in normal pregnancies. Results The sensitivity for differentiating AGA from FGR using pulsatility index (PI) was the same (94.5%) at all three locations. The specificity was highest at fetal end (FE) using PI values (99.2%) as well as for systolic to diastolic (S/D) ratio (100%). Likewise, sensitivity and specificity both were highest (89.1% and 99.2% respectively) at FE when resistive index (RI) was used for this differentiation. Conclusion Although UA Doppler is a well-known non-invasive method used for investigating fetoplacental circulation, indices taken at fetal-end of UA are more reliable in diagnosing cases of FGR which might be due to it being a fixed site.

ImagingVol. 17(1)
University of Lahore (PK), University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.