How to Ask the ‘Right’ Questions about Artificial Intelligence in Social Sciences? Human-Centered AI as a Problem and as a Solution

In 1985, an STS scholar, Steve Woolgar, published a paper, “Why not a Sociology of Machines? The Case of Sociology and Artificial Intelligence”. Yet, there is no solid sociological (social sciences in general) tradition of studying AI phenomena up to now. Why? Part of the answer: Woolgar’s question – are artificially intelligent machines sufficiently like humans to be treated as the subject of sociological inquiry? – directed scholars in the wrong way. In this paper, we demonstrate why this direction is wrong and which one should be taken instead. We begin with a rather short discussion of the “artificial intelligence’ (AI) definition; then, after a brief sketch of the human-centered system strategy, we delineate five types and three levels of social sciences research on AI. After that, we characterize our understanding of the problem of AI and Ethics. Further, we claim that HCAI is a united idea for the AI community, including social scientists who study machines and algorithms in society. In conclusion, we summarize our argument on why Woolgar’s question is ‘wrong’ and what the ‘right’ questions are for AI research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ... International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32473/flairs.38.1.139027
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to Ask the ‘Right’ Questions about Artificial Intelligence in Social Sciences? Human-Centered AI as a Problem and as a Solution

Andrey Rezaev
Proceedings of the ... International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

How to Ask the ‘Right’ Questions about Artificial Intelligence in Social Sciences? Human-Centered AI as a Problem and as a Solution

Andrey Rezaev
article en

Abstract

In 1985, an STS scholar, Steve Woolgar, published a paper, “Why not a Sociology of Machines? The Case of Sociology and Artificial Intelligence”. Yet, there is no solid sociological (social sciences in general) tradition of studying AI phenomena up to now. Why? Part of the answer: Woolgar’s question – are artificially intelligent machines sufficiently like humans to be treated as the subject of sociological inquiry? – directed scholars in the wrong way. In this paper, we demonstrate why this direction is wrong and which one should be taken instead. We begin with a rather short discussion of the “artificial intelligence’ (AI) definition; then, after a brief sketch of the human-centered system strategy, we delineate five types and three levels of social sciences research on AI. After that, we characterize our understanding of the problem of AI and Ethics. Further, we claim that HCAI is a united idea for the AI community, including social scientists who study machines and algorithms in society. In conclusion, we summarize our argument on why Woolgar’s question is ‘wrong’ and what the ‘right’ questions are for AI research.

Proceedings of the ... International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society ConferenceVol. 38
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.