The hidden toxicity of solid phase extraction blanks in water analysis

Nontoxic blank samples are a prerequisite in effect-directed analysis to ensure that any measured bioassay activity stems from chemicals in the environmental sample, and not from chemicals added through the sampling and sample preparation procedures. In a study on wastewater, solid phase extraction (SPE) blank samples, prepared by extracting clean water (such as tap water, demineralized water, etc.) using the same methodology as real wastewater, showed toxic effects in algae, daphnia, and in vitro bioassays. The aim of this study was to pinpoint the origin of the chemicals responsible for the observed toxicity, and to provide guidance on how to remediate their occurrence. Analysis revealed that the elution solvents optimized for SPE, composed of methanol (MeOH), NH4OH, and formic acid, constituted a significant source of toxicity, even when evaporated to dryness. Ammonium was the primary source of toxicity in the algae assay. Formic acid released toxic metal ions from the system and SPE materials, particularly Cu and Zn, which strongly affected daphnia. Switching to pure MeOH as the elution solvent alleviated most of the toxicity, although some metals remained. Further reductions in toxicity were achieved by replacing ultra-pure water with an ion-rich artificial freshwater medium for preparing blank samples. Three tested SPE materials (graphitized carbon, hydrophilic-lipophilic balance, and ENV+) released unidentified toxic chemicals correlating with algae toxicity and estrogen receptor activity, but these could be eliminated through extensive MeOH washing before packing the cartridges. Nontoxic levels of plasticizers were detected from system components. In conclusion, altering SPE elution solvents, washing SPE materials, and using artificial freshwater as blanks minimized the release of chemicals and ensured nontoxic blank samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf127
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Analytical chemistry methods development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The hidden toxicity of solid phase extraction blanks in water analysis

Kristoffer Kilpinen, Jan H. Christensen, Mafalda Castro, Nina Cedergreen et al.
1 citations
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Analytical chemistry methods development
0.75
article

The hidden toxicity of solid phase extraction blanks in water analysis

Kristoffer Kilpinen, Jan H. Christensen, Mafalda Castro, Nina Cedergreen, Selina Tisler, Johan Lundqvist, Jason Devers, Mathias B. Jørgensen, Yan Wang, Austeja Luckute
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Nontoxic blank samples are a prerequisite in effect-directed analysis to ensure that any measured bioassay activity stems from chemicals in the environmental sample, and not from chemicals added through the sampling and sample preparation procedures. In a study on wastewater, solid phase extraction (SPE) blank samples, prepared by extracting clean water (such as tap water, demineralized water, etc.) using the same methodology as real wastewater, showed toxic effects in algae, daphnia, and in vitro bioassays. The aim of this study was to pinpoint the origin of the chemicals responsible for the observed toxicity, and to provide guidance on how to remediate their occurrence. Analysis revealed that the elution solvents optimized for SPE, composed of methanol (MeOH), NH4OH, and formic acid, constituted a significant source of toxicity, even when evaporated to dryness. Ammonium was the primary source of toxicity in the algae assay. Formic acid released toxic metal ions from the system and SPE materials, particularly Cu and Zn, which strongly affected daphnia. Switching to pure MeOH as the elution solvent alleviated most of the toxicity, although some metals remained. Further reductions in toxicity were achieved by replacing ultra-pure water with an ion-rich artificial freshwater medium for preparing blank samples. Three tested SPE materials (graphitized carbon, hydrophilic-lipophilic balance, and ENV+) released unidentified toxic chemicals correlating with algae toxicity and estrogen receptor activity, but these could be eliminated through extensive MeOH washing before packing the cartridges. Nontoxic levels of plasticizers were detected from system components. In conclusion, altering SPE elution solvents, washing SPE materials, and using artificial freshwater as blanks minimized the release of chemicals and ensured nontoxic blank samples.

Environmental Toxicology and ChemistryVol. 44(8)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Copenhagen Business School (DK), Frederiksberg Hospital (DK), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Eurofins (Denmark) (DK)
Innovationsfonden, China Scholarship Council
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Analytical chemistry methods development
0.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.