Public Opinion Classification on Government Policy Using Social Media: An Exploration of ChatGPT’s Capabilities and Limitations

Gauging the public’s sentiments and opinions toward policies is a critical task for policy makers. Social media posts offer a wealth of information for such a task but also pose unique challenges for achieving reasonable accuracy and transparency. While a well-trained machine learning model can offer accurate classifications of public perspectives, it cannot offer its reasoning for that classification or any further abstraction, which makes it difficult to use such solutions in practice. ChatGPT offers a possible solution; if the LLM has the requisite accuracy, the ability to explain the reasoning behind its decisions is built in. In this poster, we demonstrate ChatGPT’s potential for such a task by documenting its accuracy and reasoning on opinion classification for posts regarding government policy in zero-shot and few-shot scenarios and compare the results to those of well-respected Natural Language Inference (NLI) models and ground truth human labels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ... International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32473/flairs.38.1.138905
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Opinion Classification on Government Policy Using Social Media: An Exploration of ChatGPT’s Capabilities and Limitations

Soon Ae Chun, Tammy Babad-Falk
Proceedings of the ... International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
article

Public Opinion Classification on Government Policy Using Social Media: An Exploration of ChatGPT’s Capabilities and Limitations

Soon Ae Chun, Tammy Babad-Falk
article en

Abstract

Gauging the public’s sentiments and opinions toward policies is a critical task for policy makers. Social media posts offer a wealth of information for such a task but also pose unique challenges for achieving reasonable accuracy and transparency. While a well-trained machine learning model can offer accurate classifications of public perspectives, it cannot offer its reasoning for that classification or any further abstraction, which makes it difficult to use such solutions in practice. ChatGPT offers a possible solution; if the LLM has the requisite accuracy, the ability to explain the reasoning behind its decisions is built in. In this poster, we demonstrate ChatGPT’s potential for such a task by documenting its accuracy and reasoning on opinion classification for posts regarding government policy in zero-shot and few-shot scenarios and compare the results to those of well-respected Natural Language Inference (NLI) models and ground truth human labels.

Proceedings of the ... International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society ConferenceVol. 38
College of Staten Island (US), City University of New York (US), CUNY School of Law (US), York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.