Mammography screening and risk factor prevalence by sexual identity: A comparison of two national surveys

LGBQ women were more likely than straight women to be exposed to breast cancer risk factors, which were compounded by lower screening and facing health care access barriers. It is crucial to identify interventions for screening and risk reduction that are accessible and effective for LGBQ women, particularly bisexual/queer women and those aging into screen-eligibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35852
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mammography screening and risk factor prevalence by sexual identity: A comparison of two national surveys

Brittany M. Charlton, Amy Trentham‐Dietz, Phillip W. Schnarrs, Uwe Siebert et al.
2 citations
Cancer
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
2.09
article

Mammography screening and risk factor prevalence by sexual identity: A comparison of two national surveys

Brittany M. Charlton, Amy Trentham‐Dietz, Phillip W. Schnarrs, Uwe Siebert, Jennifer C. Spencer, Hanwen Zhang, Navkiran K. Shokar, Felicitas Kuehne, Michael Pignone
article en
2 citations

Abstract

LGBQ women were more likely than straight women to be exposed to breast cancer risk factors, which were compounded by lower screening and facing health care access barriers. It is crucial to identify interventions for screening and risk reduction that are accessible and effective for LGBQ women, particularly bisexual/queer women and those aging into screen-eligibility.

CancerVol. 131(10)
Austin College (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Harvard University (US), Duke University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center (US), Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (US), UMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik (AT), Duke Institute for Health Innovation (US), Decision Sciences (United States) (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Cancer Institute, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mammography screening and risk factor prevalence by sexual identity: A comparison of two national surveys — Brittany M. Charlton, Amy Trentham‐Dietz, et al. · Cancer (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS