Algorithmic accountability and ethical oversight: legal challenges in transatlantic AI regulation

This paper examines the legal systems governing AI in the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) and the conditions associated with regulating the growing AI advancement. In comparing the GDPR of the European Union and the proposed AI regulation across industries such as healthcare, transportation, and the military in the United States, similarities and dissimilarities emerge in the two areas‘approaches to regulating AI. The current frameworks also lack sufficient provisions regarding ethics and bias, particularly in algorithms and general transparency. This also stresses the importance of a better global approach that would specify necessary mechanisms protecting people’s privacy and enforcing accountability and fairness of AI. The insights will be made to suggest improvements regarding the regulation of AI in both areas, as well as an insight into the global discussion about the proper deployment of applied artificial intelligence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Research Archive
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.2.0722
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic accountability and ethical oversight: legal challenges in transatlantic AI regulation

Jelena Vujičić
International Journal of Science and Research Archive
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Algorithmic accountability and ethical oversight: legal challenges in transatlantic AI regulation

Jelena Vujičić
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the legal systems governing AI in the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) and the conditions associated with regulating the growing AI advancement. In comparing the GDPR of the European Union and the proposed AI regulation across industries such as healthcare, transportation, and the military in the United States, similarities and dissimilarities emerge in the two areas‘approaches to regulating AI. The current frameworks also lack sufficient provisions regarding ethics and bias, particularly in algorithms and general transparency. This also stresses the importance of a better global approach that would specify necessary mechanisms protecting people’s privacy and enforcing accountability and fairness of AI. The insights will be made to suggest improvements regarding the regulation of AI in both areas, as well as an insight into the global discussion about the proper deployment of applied artificial intelligence.

International Journal of Science and Research ArchiveVol. 13(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.