Machine learning for grading prediction and survival analysis in high grade glioma

We developed and validated a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics model for the classification of high-grade glioma (HGG) and determined the optimal machine learning (ML) approach. This retrospective analysis included 184 patients (59 grade III lesions and 125 grade IV lesions). Radiomics features were extracted from MRI with T1-weighted imaging (T1WI). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) feature selection method and seven classification methods including logistic regression, XGBoost, Decision Tree, Random Forest (RF), Adaboost, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, and Stacking fusion model were used to differentiate HGG. Performance was compared on AUC, sensitivity, accuracy, precision and specificity. In the non-fusion models, the best performance was achieved by using the XGBoost classifier, and using SMOTE to deal with the data imbalance to improve the performance of all the classifiers. The Stacking fusion model performed the best, with an AUC = 0.95 (sensitivity of 0.84; accuracy of 0.85; F1 score of 0.85). MRI-based quantitative radiomics features have good performance in identifying the classification of HGG. The XGBoost method outperforms the classifiers in the non-fusion model and the Stacking fusion model outperforms the non-fusion model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01413-4
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning for grading prediction and survival analysis in high grade glioma

Enyu Wang, Yijun Shen, Sihui Yu, Xueqi Huang et al.
5 citations
Scientific Reports
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
6.80
article

Machine learning for grading prediction and survival analysis in high grade glioma

Enyu Wang, Yijun Shen, Sihui Yu, Xueqi Huang, Yunxiang Cai, Renyuan Zhang, Yang Yang, Ling Zhu, Xiangzhi Li, Zheng Lin
article en
5 citations

Abstract

We developed and validated a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics model for the classification of high-grade glioma (HGG) and determined the optimal machine learning (ML) approach. This retrospective analysis included 184 patients (59 grade III lesions and 125 grade IV lesions). Radiomics features were extracted from MRI with T1-weighted imaging (T1WI). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) feature selection method and seven classification methods including logistic regression, XGBoost, Decision Tree, Random Forest (RF), Adaboost, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, and Stacking fusion model were used to differentiate HGG. Performance was compared on AUC, sensitivity, accuracy, precision and specificity. In the non-fusion models, the best performance was achieved by using the XGBoost classifier, and using SMOTE to deal with the data imbalance to improve the performance of all the classifiers. The Stacking fusion model performed the best, with an AUC = 0.95 (sensitivity of 0.84; accuracy of 0.85; F1 score of 0.85). MRI-based quantitative radiomics features have good performance in identifying the classification of HGG. The XGBoost method outperforms the classifiers in the non-fusion model and the Stacking fusion model outperforms the non-fusion model.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Guangxi University of Science and Technology (CN), Wenzhou Medical University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN), Zhejiang Taizhou Hospital (CN), Hainan Medical University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
6.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.