Comparison of different auxiliary techniques used during root canal filling removal in terms of the amount of apically extruded debris: In vitro study

The study concludes that auxiliary methods used during root canal filling removal significantly impact the degree of apical debris extrusion, with some methods leading to greater extrusion than others.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323807
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of different auxiliary techniques used during root canal filling removal in terms of the amount of apically extruded debris: In vitro study

Rawan Alqawasmi, İsmail Uzun, Kevser Şenel
PLoS ONE
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Comparison of different auxiliary techniques used during root canal filling removal in terms of the amount of apically extruded debris: In vitro study

Rawan Alqawasmi, İsmail Uzun, Kevser Şenel
article en

Abstract

The study concludes that auxiliary methods used during root canal filling removal significantly impact the degree of apical debris extrusion, with some methods leading to greater extrusion than others.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(5)
Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR), Arab American University (PS), Ordu University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.