Disparities in physician compensation for breast and prostate cancer operations

The objective of this study was to determine whether the Center for Medicare and Medicaid services (CMS) pays more relative value units (RVUs) for prostatectomies than mastectomies across different treatment modalities. The RVU model is public information, subject to review every 5 years at minimum and has implications directly or indirectly to every medical center in the United States. These findings shed light on how the CMS values the two most prominent cancers among men and women: breast cancer and prostate cancer. An economic evaluation was conducted to appraise physician compensation for treating breast cancer vs prostate cancer. Work RVUs, malpractice RVUs, and practice expense RVUs were collected from the CMS' 2023 Physician Fee Scheduler. The total operative times, including time spent in pre-op consultations and follow ups, used by the RVU update committee to create these values were collected from the CMS' 2023 Final Rule Physician Work Times. Surgical oncologists treating breast cancer were paid an average of 15.45 RVUs per mastectomy and 2.74 per hour. The average work RVUs paid for a prostatectomy was 24.64 and 3.06 per hour. The average work RVUs paid for an axillary lymph node removal was 12.29 and 2.94 per hour. The average work RVUs paid for a pelvic lymphadenectomy was 15.87 and 3.04 per hour. The data assimilated in this study acts to illustrate the discrepancy between work RVUs for breast cancer and prostate cancer operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323892
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disparities in physician compensation for breast and prostate cancer operations

Jessica Meshman, Aren Singh Saini, Cristiane Takita, Kyle Chambers et al.
PLoS ONE
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Disparities in physician compensation for breast and prostate cancer operations

Jessica Meshman, Aren Singh Saini, Cristiane Takita, Kyle Chambers, Cyrus Washington, Noah Khosrowzadeh, Matthew Gompels, Kayla Samimi
article en

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether the Center for Medicare and Medicaid services (CMS) pays more relative value units (RVUs) for prostatectomies than mastectomies across different treatment modalities. The RVU model is public information, subject to review every 5 years at minimum and has implications directly or indirectly to every medical center in the United States. These findings shed light on how the CMS values the two most prominent cancers among men and women: breast cancer and prostate cancer. An economic evaluation was conducted to appraise physician compensation for treating breast cancer vs prostate cancer. Work RVUs, malpractice RVUs, and practice expense RVUs were collected from the CMS' 2023 Physician Fee Scheduler. The total operative times, including time spent in pre-op consultations and follow ups, used by the RVU update committee to create these values were collected from the CMS' 2023 Final Rule Physician Work Times. Surgical oncologists treating breast cancer were paid an average of 15.45 RVUs per mastectomy and 2.74 per hour. The average work RVUs paid for a prostatectomy was 24.64 and 3.06 per hour. The average work RVUs paid for an axillary lymph node removal was 12.29 and 2.94 per hour. The average work RVUs paid for a pelvic lymphadenectomy was 15.87 and 3.04 per hour. The data assimilated in this study acts to illustrate the discrepancy between work RVUs for breast cancer and prostate cancer operations.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(5)
Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.