Comparison and Testing of Equivalent Modeling Methods for Wind Farm Composed of Doubly-Fed Induction Generators

For analyzing the power system with high penetration of wind power, it is important to establish accurate models of wind turbines and wind farms, which is a basic and important work. In the analysis of wind power grid integration, it is necessary to aggregate the equivalent value of the wind farm into one or a few wind turbines. At present, there are two commonly used equivalence methods: current source multiplication (commonly used in commercial software) and full dynamic aggregation method. The former achieves wind farm equivalence by multiplying the output current of a single wind turbine generator, while the latter dynamically aggregates the wind farm into one or several large wind turbine generators. There is still a lack of research on the differences between the two. Based on the actual wind farm structure, this paper studies the electrical characteristics of steady-state operation and transient fault ride through operation using single machine dynamic aggregation method and current source multiplication method separately, and compares the equivalent simulation results with the detailed wind farm simulation results. The equivalent accuracy of the single machine aggregation method and the current source multiplication method is calculated to provide a reference for method selection in wind farm equivalent modeling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ei264398.2024.10991627
Primary Topic
Wind Turbine Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison and Testing of Equivalent Modeling Methods for Wind Farm Composed of Doubly-Fed Induction Generators

Binjiang Hu, Zhenjun Ma, Xian Meng, Yihua Zhu et al.
1 links
Wind Turbine Control Systems
article

Comparison and Testing of Equivalent Modeling Methods for Wind Farm Composed of Doubly-Fed Induction Generators

Binjiang Hu, Zhenjun Ma, Xian Meng, Yihua Zhu, Chao Xing, Liang Tu
article en

Abstract

For analyzing the power system with high penetration of wind power, it is important to establish accurate models of wind turbines and wind farms, which is a basic and important work. In the analysis of wind power grid integration, it is necessary to aggregate the equivalent value of the wind farm into one or a few wind turbines. At present, there are two commonly used equivalence methods: current source multiplication (commonly used in commercial software) and full dynamic aggregation method. The former achieves wind farm equivalence by multiplying the output current of a single wind turbine generator, while the latter dynamically aggregates the wind farm into one or several large wind turbine generators. There is still a lack of research on the differences between the two. Based on the actual wind farm structure, this paper studies the electrical characteristics of steady-state operation and transient fault ride through operation using single machine dynamic aggregation method and current source multiplication method separately, and compares the equivalent simulation results with the detailed wind farm simulation results. The equivalent accuracy of the single machine aggregation method and the current source multiplication method is calculated to provide a reference for method selection in wind farm equivalent modeling.

China Southern Power Grid (China) (CN)
China Southern Power Grid
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Wind Turbine Control Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.