Investigating the accuracy of Apple Watch VO2 max measurements: A validation study

VO2 max is a measure of cardiorespiratory fitness and a key indicator of overall health. It is predictive of cardiovascular events and shows a strong inverse association with all-cause mortality. Increased cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with reductions in coronary artery disease, diabetes and cancer. Apple Watch offers a less resource-intensive and more feasible alternative to the gold standard assessment for VO2 max, indirect calorimetry, but the accuracy of its measurements remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the validity of VO2 max estimates from Apple Watch in comparison to indirect calorimetry. Thirty participants wore an Apple Watch for 5-10 days to generate a VO2 max estimate. Subsequently, they underwent a maximal exercise treadmill test in accordance with the modified Åstrand protocol. The agreement between measurements from Apple Watch and indirect calorimetry was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and mean absolute error (MAE). Overall, Apple Watch underestimated VO2 max, with a mean difference of 6.07 mL/kg/min (95% CI 3.77-8.38). Limits of agreement indicated variability between measurement methods (lower -6.11 mL/kg/min; upper 18.26 mL/kg/min). MAPE was calculated as 13.31% (95% CI 10.01-16.61), and MAE was 6.92 mL/kg/min (95% CI 4.89-8.94). These findings indicate that Apple Watch VO2 max estimates require further refinement prior to clinical implementation. However, further consideration of Apple Watch as an alternative to conventional VO2 max prediction from submaximal exercise is warranted, given its practical utility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323741
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the accuracy of Apple Watch VO2 max measurements: A validation study

R. Lambe, Cailbhe Doherty, Maximus Baldwin, Ben O’Grady
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
2.38
article

Investigating the accuracy of Apple Watch VO2 max measurements: A validation study

R. Lambe, Cailbhe Doherty, Maximus Baldwin, Ben O’Grady
article en
1 citations

Abstract

VO2 max is a measure of cardiorespiratory fitness and a key indicator of overall health. It is predictive of cardiovascular events and shows a strong inverse association with all-cause mortality. Increased cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with reductions in coronary artery disease, diabetes and cancer. Apple Watch offers a less resource-intensive and more feasible alternative to the gold standard assessment for VO2 max, indirect calorimetry, but the accuracy of its measurements remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the validity of VO2 max estimates from Apple Watch in comparison to indirect calorimetry. Thirty participants wore an Apple Watch for 5-10 days to generate a VO2 max estimate. Subsequently, they underwent a maximal exercise treadmill test in accordance with the modified Åstrand protocol. The agreement between measurements from Apple Watch and indirect calorimetry was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and mean absolute error (MAE). Overall, Apple Watch underestimated VO2 max, with a mean difference of 6.07 mL/kg/min (95% CI 3.77-8.38). Limits of agreement indicated variability between measurement methods (lower -6.11 mL/kg/min; upper 18.26 mL/kg/min). MAPE was calculated as 13.31% (95% CI 10.01-16.61), and MAE was 6.92 mL/kg/min (95% CI 4.89-8.94). These findings indicate that Apple Watch VO2 max estimates require further refinement prior to clinical implementation. However, further consideration of Apple Watch as an alternative to conventional VO2 max prediction from submaximal exercise is warranted, given its practical utility.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(5)
University College Dublin (IE), Dublin City University (IE)
Science Foundation Ireland
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
2.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.