Threats and Defenses in the Federated Learning Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Survey and Challenges

Federated learning (FL) offers innovative solutions for privacy-preserving distributed machine learning (ML). Different from centralized data collection algorithms, FL enables participants to locally train their model and only share the model updates for aggregation. Since private data never leaves the end node, FL effectively mitigates privacy leakage during collaborative training. Despite its promising potential, FL is vulnerable to various attacks due to its distributed nature, affecting the entire life cycle of FL services. These threats can harm the model's utility or compromise participants' privacy, either directly or indirectly. In response, numerous defense frameworks have been proposed, demonstrating effectiveness in specific settings and scenarios. To provide a clear understanding of the current research landscape, this article reviews the most representative and state-of-the-art threats and defense frameworks throughout the FL service life cycle. We start by identifying FL threats that harm utility and privacy, including those with potential or direct impacts. Then, we dive into the defense frameworks, analyze the relationship between threats and defenses, and compare the trade-offs among different defense strategies. We subsequently revisit these studies to evaluate their practicality in real-world scenarios and conclude by summarizing existing research bottlenecks and outlining future directions. We hope this survey sheds light on trustworthy FL research and contributes to the FL community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tnnls.2025.3563537
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
116.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Threats and Defenses in the Federated Learning Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Survey and Challenges

Zhongliang Guo, Yanli Li, Dong Yuan, Weiping Ding et al.
14 citations
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
116.04
article

Threats and Defenses in the Federated Learning Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Survey and Challenges

Zhongliang Guo, Yanli Li, Dong Yuan, Weiping Ding, Nan Yang, Huaming Chen
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) offers innovative solutions for privacy-preserving distributed machine learning (ML). Different from centralized data collection algorithms, FL enables participants to locally train their model and only share the model updates for aggregation. Since private data never leaves the end node, FL effectively mitigates privacy leakage during collaborative training. Despite its promising potential, FL is vulnerable to various attacks due to its distributed nature, affecting the entire life cycle of FL services. These threats can harm the model's utility or compromise participants' privacy, either directly or indirectly. In response, numerous defense frameworks have been proposed, demonstrating effectiveness in specific settings and scenarios. To provide a clear understanding of the current research landscape, this article reviews the most representative and state-of-the-art threats and defense frameworks throughout the FL service life cycle. We start by identifying FL threats that harm utility and privacy, including those with potential or direct impacts. Then, we dive into the defense frameworks, analyze the relationship between threats and defenses, and compare the trade-offs among different defense strategies. We subsequently revisit these studies to evaluate their practicality in real-world scenarios and conclude by summarizing existing research bottlenecks and outlining future directions. We hope this survey sheds light on trustworthy FL research and contributes to the FL community.

IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning SystemsVol. 36(9)
The University of Sydney (AU), University of St Andrews (GB), Nantong University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, Natural Science Research of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Zero hunger, Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
116.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.