Assessment of Clinical Oncology Nurses’ Recognition and Management of Cancer-Induced Fatigue in Patients: A Questionnaire-Based Study

Objective: To investigate the status of clinical oncology nurses’ identification and management of cancer-induced fatigue in cancer patients. Methods: A total of 231 clinical oncology nurses in a hospital were surveyed using a self-compiled questionnaire for the identification and management of cancer-related fatigue. The recognition, management, and influencing factors of cancer-related fatigue were analyzed using percentage calculations and single-factor and multi-factor analyses. Results: Clinical oncology nurses demonstrated poor recognition of cancer-induced fatigue. The identification accuracy, ranked from highest to lowest, was as follows: influence of cancer fatigue (98.27%), risk factors (97.84%), clinical manifestations (97.40%), characteristics (94.37%), incidence (89.18%), mitigation measures (61.90%), progression (54.11%), evaluation indexes (16.88%), and diagnostic criteria (8.23%). Management was similarly inadequate, with an average implementation rate of 68.01%, falling short of guideline recommendations. Age and years of experience were identified as influencing factors. Conclusions: The identification and management of cancer-related fatigue by clinical oncology nurses require improvement. Hospital administrators should actively respond to guideline recommendations by enhancing the construction of cancer fatigue management systems and emphasizing theoretical and practical education on cancer fatigue for nurses. These measures would facilitate improved patient care and quality of life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Precision Medicine
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18063/apm.v10i1.679
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Clinical Oncology Nurses’ Recognition and Management of Cancer-Induced Fatigue in Patients: A Questionnaire-Based Study

Meng Jia, Yanan Ma, Jiarui Mi, Bei Wang et al.
2 links
Advances in Precision Medicine
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Assessment of Clinical Oncology Nurses’ Recognition and Management of Cancer-Induced Fatigue in Patients: A Questionnaire-Based Study

Meng Jia, Yanan Ma, Jiarui Mi, Bei Wang, Jin Liu
article en

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the status of clinical oncology nurses’ identification and management of cancer-induced fatigue in cancer patients. Methods: A total of 231 clinical oncology nurses in a hospital were surveyed using a self-compiled questionnaire for the identification and management of cancer-related fatigue. The recognition, management, and influencing factors of cancer-related fatigue were analyzed using percentage calculations and single-factor and multi-factor analyses. Results: Clinical oncology nurses demonstrated poor recognition of cancer-induced fatigue. The identification accuracy, ranked from highest to lowest, was as follows: influence of cancer fatigue (98.27%), risk factors (97.84%), clinical manifestations (97.40%), characteristics (94.37%), incidence (89.18%), mitigation measures (61.90%), progression (54.11%), evaluation indexes (16.88%), and diagnostic criteria (8.23%). Management was similarly inadequate, with an average implementation rate of 68.01%, falling short of guideline recommendations. Age and years of experience were identified as influencing factors. Conclusions: The identification and management of cancer-related fatigue by clinical oncology nurses require improvement. Hospital administrators should actively respond to guideline recommendations by enhancing the construction of cancer fatigue management systems and emphasizing theoretical and practical education on cancer fatigue for nurses. These measures would facilitate improved patient care and quality of life.

Advances in Precision MedicineVol. 10(1)
Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.