Investigating the Independent and Combined Effects of Startle and Surprise in a Simulated Flight Task

ObjectiveWe aimed to characterize the impact of startle and surprise, both independently and in combination, on subjective feelings, behavior (task performance and gaze behavior), and several physiological parameters.BackgroundThe effects of startle and surprise are known to affect pilots' cognitive performance, with potential impact on safety. Startle and surprise can occur either together or independently, yet no studies have experimentally distinguished their specific effects.MethodParticipants (<i>n</i> = 45) were each assigned to one of the three conditions while performing the MATB-II task. In the startle condition, participants were subjected to an expected loud sound. In the surprise condition, an unexpected reverse video effect was applied to the experimental interface. In the combination condition, participants were exposed to both stimuli simultaneously.ResultsSurprise was associated with an increase in skin conductance without affecting performance. In contrast, startle was marked by a decline in performance on the communication sub-task, increased skin conductance and heart rate, and a narrowing of attention. When startle and surprise were combined, the results mirrored those of startle alone but included a stronger feeling of startle and surprise, and a more prolonged heart rate increase.ConclusionStartle and surprise combined yielded more numerous significant effects on subjective, behavioral, and physiological measures than startle and surprise independently.ApplicationIdentifying the specific impacts of startle and surprise could pave the way for their automatic detection using artificial intelligence. Safety could be enhanced through the design of specific countermeasures to help the crew cope with such states.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208251342100
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the Independent and Combined Effects of Startle and Surprise in a Simulated Flight Task

Alexandre Duchevet, Jérémie Garcia, Jean-Paul Imbert, Mickaël Causse et al.
5 citations
Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
12.19
article

Investigating the Independent and Combined Effects of Startle and Surprise in a Simulated Flight Task

Alexandre Duchevet, Jérémie Garcia, Jean-Paul Imbert, Mickaël Causse, Benoît Lamirault
article en
5 citations

Abstract

ObjectiveWe aimed to characterize the impact of startle and surprise, both independently and in combination, on subjective feelings, behavior (task performance and gaze behavior), and several physiological parameters.BackgroundThe effects of startle and surprise are known to affect pilots' cognitive performance, with potential impact on safety. Startle and surprise can occur either together or independently, yet no studies have experimentally distinguished their specific effects.MethodParticipants (<i>n</i> = 45) were each assigned to one of the three conditions while performing the MATB-II task. In the startle condition, participants were subjected to an expected loud sound. In the surprise condition, an unexpected reverse video effect was applied to the experimental interface. In the combination condition, participants were exposed to both stimuli simultaneously.ResultsSurprise was associated with an increase in skin conductance without affecting performance. In contrast, startle was marked by a decline in performance on the communication sub-task, increased skin conductance and heart rate, and a narrowing of attention. When startle and surprise were combined, the results mirrored those of startle alone but included a stronger feeling of startle and surprise, and a more prolonged heart rate increase.ConclusionStartle and surprise combined yielded more numerous significant effects on subjective, behavioral, and physiological measures than startle and surprise independently.ApplicationIdentifying the specific impacts of startle and surprise could pave the way for their automatic detection using artificial intelligence. Safety could be enhanced through the design of specific countermeasures to help the crew cope with such states.

Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietyVol. 67(11)
École Nationale de l’Aviation Civile (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Institut Superieur de l'Aeronautique et de l'Espace (ISAE-SUPAERO) (FR), Office National d'Études et de Recherches Aérospatiales (FR), Laboratoire de l'Intégration du Matériau au Système (FR), Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux (FR)
HORIZON EUROPE Climate, Energy and Mobility
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
12.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.