Development and Comparison of Two 3D-Printed Scaffolds of Biosilica from Marine Sponges for Bone Tissue Engineering

This study compared the physicochemical characteristics and biological effects of two 3D-printed biosilica (BS) scaffolds (grid and gyroid). The methods included scanning electron microscopy (SEM), porosity, mass loss, pH assessment, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The mechanical evaluation involved a compression test, and the in vitro tests used cell adhesion assays with osteoblastic and fibroblastic cell lines. SEM showed BS spicules in both models at day 0 with signs of degradation throughout the experimental immersion periods, forming a homogeneous network with interaction with alginate. Porosity measurements showed an average of 85.9% ± 0.9 for the grid model and 83.6% ± 0.7 for the gyroid model. The gyroid model demonstrated higher values in the compression test, a decrease in pH on day 1, and no difference for both models on days 3, 7, and 14. Mass loss was greatest in the gyroid model on day 21. FTIR tests showed characteristic peaks for ALG and BS. EDS detected silica (Si), chlorine (Cl), and calcium (Ca). In the cell adhesion assay, both models supported the adhesion and proliferation of L929 (fibroblast) and MC3T3-E1 (osteoblastic) cells, with the gyroid model showing better elongation and cell morphology. Overall, the gyroid model showed better physicochemical properties, higher mechanical strength, and improved biological performance compared to the grid model, making it a promising option for tissue engineering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Omega
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c11383
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Comparison of Two 3D-Printed Scaffolds of Biosilica from Marine Sponges for Bone Tissue Engineering

Francisco Vieira dos Santos, Beatriz Louise Mendes Viegas, Ana Cláudia Muniz Rennó, Gustavo Oliva Amaral et al.
1 citations
ACS Omega
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
0.67
article

Development and Comparison of Two 3D-Printed Scaffolds of Biosilica from Marine Sponges for Bone Tissue Engineering

Francisco Vieira dos Santos, Beatriz Louise Mendes Viegas, Ana Cláudia Muniz Rennó, Gustavo Oliva Amaral, Daniel S. Côrrea, Amanda de Souza, João Paulo dos Santos Prado, Karolyne dos Santos Jorge Sousa, Renata Neves Granito, Amanda Sardeli Alqualo, Giovanna do Espirito Santo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study compared the physicochemical characteristics and biological effects of two 3D-printed biosilica (BS) scaffolds (grid and gyroid). The methods included scanning electron microscopy (SEM), porosity, mass loss, pH assessment, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The mechanical evaluation involved a compression test, and the in vitro tests used cell adhesion assays with osteoblastic and fibroblastic cell lines. SEM showed BS spicules in both models at day 0 with signs of degradation throughout the experimental immersion periods, forming a homogeneous network with interaction with alginate. Porosity measurements showed an average of 85.9% ± 0.9 for the grid model and 83.6% ± 0.7 for the gyroid model. The gyroid model demonstrated higher values in the compression test, a decrease in pH on day 1, and no difference for both models on days 3, 7, and 14. Mass loss was greatest in the gyroid model on day 21. FTIR tests showed characteristic peaks for ALG and BS. EDS detected silica (Si), chlorine (Cl), and calcium (Ca). In the cell adhesion assay, both models supported the adhesion and proliferation of L929 (fibroblast) and MC3T3-E1 (osteoblastic) cells, with the gyroid model showing better elongation and cell morphology. Overall, the gyroid model showed better physicochemical properties, higher mechanical strength, and improved biological performance compared to the grid model, making it a promising option for tissue engineering.

ACS OmegaVol. 10(20)
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (BR), Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.