Multi-wavelength properties of <i>z</i> ≳ 6 Laser Interferometer Space Antenna detectable events

We investigated the intrinsic and observational properties of z ≳ 6 galaxies that host the coalescence of massive black holes (MBHs; M BH ∼ 10 5−6 M ⊙ ) giving rise to gravitational waves (GWs) detectable with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). We adopted a zoom-in cosmological hydrodynamical simulation of galaxy formation and black hole (BH) co-evolution, based on the GADGET-3 code, zoomed-in on an M h ∼ 10 12 M ⊙ dark matter halo at z = 6, which hosts a fast accreting ( Ṁ ∼ 35 M ⊙ yr −1 ) super-massive black hole (SMBH; M BH ∼ 10 9 M ⊙ ) and a star-forming galaxy (SFR ∼ 100 M ⊙ yr −1 ). Tracing the SMBH’s formation backwards in time, we identified the merger events associated with its formation and selected those that are detectable with LISA. Among these LISA-detectable events (LDEs), we selected those–based on their intrinsic properties ( Ṁ , SFR, gas metallicity, and dust mass)–that were expected to be bright in one or more electromagnetic (EM) bands, such as rest-frame X-ray, UV and far-infrared (FIR). After considering the effect of delay due to dynamical friction in the MBH coalescence, we further restricted our selection to those LDEs that are still occurring at z ≳ 6. We find that ∼20–30% of the LDEs and their host galaxies are also detectable with EM telescopes. We post-processed these events with dust radiative transfer calculations to make accurate predictions about their spectral energy distributions (SEDs) and continuum maps in the JWST to ALMA wavelength range. We compared the spectra arising from galaxies hosting the merging MBHs with those arising from the active galactic nuclei (AGN) powered by single accreting BHs. We find that identifying an LDE from the continuum SEDs is impossible because of the absence of specific imprints from the merging MBHs. Finally, we computed the profile of the H α line arising from LDEs, taking into account both the contribution from their star-forming regions and the accreting MBHs. We find that the presence of two accreting MBHs would be difficult to infer even if both MBHs accrete at super-Eddington rates ( λ EDD ∼ 5 − 10). We conclude that the combined detection of GW and EM signals from z ≳ 6 MBHs is challenging (if not impossible) not only because of the poor sky-localization (∼10 deg 2 ) provided by LISA, but also because the loudest GW emitters ( M BH ∼ 10 5−6 M ⊙ ) are not massive enough to leave significant signatures (e.g. extended wings) in the emission lines arising from the broad line region.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452926
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-wavelength properties of z ≳ 6 Laser Interferometer Space Antenna detectable events

S. Gallerani, Tommaso Zana, Stefano Carniani, Maulik Bhatt et al.
1 citations
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
1.15
article

Multi-wavelength properties of z ≳ 6 Laser Interferometer Space Antenna detectable events

S. Gallerani, Tommaso Zana, Stefano Carniani, Maulik Bhatt, Fabio Vito, Milena Valentini, Fabio Di Mascia, Srija Chakraborty
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We investigated the intrinsic and observational properties of z ≳ 6 galaxies that host the coalescence of massive black holes (MBHs; M BH ∼ 10 5−6 M ⊙ ) giving rise to gravitational waves (GWs) detectable with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). We adopted a zoom-in cosmological hydrodynamical simulation of galaxy formation and black hole (BH) co-evolution, based on the GADGET-3 code, zoomed-in on an M h ∼ 10 12 M ⊙ dark matter halo at z = 6, which hosts a fast accreting ( Ṁ ∼ 35 M ⊙ yr −1 ) super-massive black hole (SMBH; M BH ∼ 10 9 M ⊙ ) and a star-forming galaxy (SFR ∼ 100 M ⊙ yr −1 ). Tracing the SMBH’s formation backwards in time, we identified the merger events associated with its formation and selected those that are detectable with LISA. Among these LISA-detectable events (LDEs), we selected those–based on their intrinsic properties ( Ṁ , SFR, gas metallicity, and dust mass)–that were expected to be bright in one or more electromagnetic (EM) bands, such as rest-frame X-ray, UV and far-infrared (FIR). After considering the effect of delay due to dynamical friction in the MBH coalescence, we further restricted our selection to those LDEs that are still occurring at z ≳ 6. We find that ∼20–30% of the LDEs and their host galaxies are also detectable with EM telescopes. We post-processed these events with dust radiative transfer calculations to make accurate predictions about their spectral energy distributions (SEDs) and continuum maps in the JWST to ALMA wavelength range. We compared the spectra arising from galaxies hosting the merging MBHs with those arising from the active galactic nuclei (AGN) powered by single accreting BHs. We find that identifying an LDE from the continuum SEDs is impossible because of the absence of specific imprints from the merging MBHs. Finally, we computed the profile of the H α line arising from LDEs, taking into account both the contribution from their star-forming regions and the accreting MBHs. We find that the presence of two accreting MBHs would be difficult to infer even if both MBHs accrete at super-Eddington rates ( λ EDD ∼ 5 − 10). We conclude that the combined detection of GW and EM signals from z ≳ 6 MBHs is challenging (if not impossible) not only because of the poor sky-localization (∼10 deg 2 ) provided by LISA, but also because the loudest GW emitters ( M BH ∼ 10 5−6 M ⊙ ) are not massive enough to leave significant signatures (e.g. extended wings) in the emission lines arising from the broad line region.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 698
European Commission, Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.