Almaty ankle exoskeleton: comparative analysis and structural improvements of versions V.1 and V.2

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the V.1 and V.2 versions of the Almaty Ankle Exoskeleton. The main objective of the study is to identify the structural and functional shortcomings observed in the first version (V.1) and to develop an improved prototype in the second version (V.2) by addressing these issues. The paper compares the kinematic schemes, CAD models, and physical prototypes of both versions, highlighting their structural differences and technical advancements. In addition, the results of a static structural analysis performed on the V.2 prototype using the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) method are presented. This analysis allowed for the evaluation of stress, strain, and displacement distribution within the structure. The results demonstrated that the exoskeleton can effectively handle applied loads, although additional reinforcement is required in certain critical regions. Overall, the findings provide a foundation for engineering solutions aimed at enhancing the functional performance of the ankle exoskeleton and its application in rehabilitation processes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Vibroengineering PROCEDIA
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2025.24972
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Almaty ankle exoskeleton: comparative analysis and structural improvements of versions V.1 and V.2

Nursultan Zhetenbayev, Гани Сергазин, Dinara Seisenova
1 citations
Vibroengineering PROCEDIA
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
0.67
article

Almaty ankle exoskeleton: comparative analysis and structural improvements of versions V.1 and V.2

Nursultan Zhetenbayev, Гани Сергазин, Dinara Seisenova
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the V.1 and V.2 versions of the Almaty Ankle Exoskeleton. The main objective of the study is to identify the structural and functional shortcomings observed in the first version (V.1) and to develop an improved prototype in the second version (V.2) by addressing these issues. The paper compares the kinematic schemes, CAD models, and physical prototypes of both versions, highlighting their structural differences and technical advancements. In addition, the results of a static structural analysis performed on the V.2 prototype using the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) method are presented. This analysis allowed for the evaluation of stress, strain, and displacement distribution within the structure. The results demonstrated that the exoskeleton can effectively handle applied loads, although additional reinforcement is required in certain critical regions. Overall, the findings provide a foundation for engineering solutions aimed at enhancing the functional performance of the ankle exoskeleton and its application in rehabilitation processes.

Vibroengineering PROCEDIAVol. 58
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.