Discriminatory Practices in the German Mental Healthcare System: An Intersectional Grounded Theory Study

Discriminatory practices within mental healthcare are a major barrier to the equitable provision of care to <i>all</i> mental healthcare service users. Understanding mechanisms of discrimination is a prerequisite for developing suitable measures to address them. Intersectionality, a framework rooted in Black feminism, has proven to be a powerful tool for understanding the specific forms and experiences of discrimination within interconnected systems of oppression. This study is the first to use an intersectional lens to examine discriminatory practices within the German mental healthcare system from the perspectives of service users, providers, and psychosocial counselors. In collaboration with local organizations in Bochum, Germany, we conducted 17 semi-structured interviews. The data were analyzed according to constructed grounded theory methodology. Our results indicate that discriminatory practices undermine access to and quality of healthcare delivery for marginalized mental healthcare service users. On an interpersonal level, these practices included stereotyping, devaluation, Othering, invalidation, silencing, withholding information, and treatment refusals. On an organizational level, care was undermined by a lack of interpretation services, discriminatory admission practices and documentation procedures, a lack of competencies among mental healthcare providers, as well as suitable treatment options and environments for marginalized service users. Service users described various strategies to navigate mental healthcare, including confrontation and selective narration. Mental healthcare providers showed various reactions toward discriminatory practices, ranging from defensiveness to acknowledgment. We discuss the results in their interrelationship with institutional Whiteness, cis-heteronormativity, and mental illness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Health Research
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251325793
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discriminatory Practices in the German Mental Healthcare System: An Intersectional Grounded Theory Study

Amma Yeboah, Mirjam Faissner, Georg Juckel, Alva Träbert et al.
Qualitative Health Research
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
article

Discriminatory Practices in the German Mental Healthcare System: An Intersectional Grounded Theory Study

Amma Yeboah, Mirjam Faissner, Georg Juckel, Alva Träbert, Eike Leidgens, Neneh Rosalía Quadflieg, Patiani Batchati
article en

Abstract

Discriminatory practices within mental healthcare are a major barrier to the equitable provision of care to <i>all</i> mental healthcare service users. Understanding mechanisms of discrimination is a prerequisite for developing suitable measures to address them. Intersectionality, a framework rooted in Black feminism, has proven to be a powerful tool for understanding the specific forms and experiences of discrimination within interconnected systems of oppression. This study is the first to use an intersectional lens to examine discriminatory practices within the German mental healthcare system from the perspectives of service users, providers, and psychosocial counselors. In collaboration with local organizations in Bochum, Germany, we conducted 17 semi-structured interviews. The data were analyzed according to constructed grounded theory methodology. Our results indicate that discriminatory practices undermine access to and quality of healthcare delivery for marginalized mental healthcare service users. On an interpersonal level, these practices included stereotyping, devaluation, Othering, invalidation, silencing, withholding information, and treatment refusals. On an organizational level, care was undermined by a lack of interpretation services, discriminatory admission practices and documentation procedures, a lack of competencies among mental healthcare providers, as well as suitable treatment options and environments for marginalized service users. Service users described various strategies to navigate mental healthcare, including confrontation and selective narration. Mental healthcare providers showed various reactions toward discriminatory practices, ranging from defensiveness to acknowledgment. We discuss the results in their interrelationship with institutional Whiteness, cis-heteronormativity, and mental illness.

Qualitative Health Research
The Center for Victims of Torture (US), Refugee Council (GB), Dynamic Research (United States) (US), LWL-Universitätsklinikum Bochum (DE), Phipps Houses (US), Institute of Pharmacology Russian Academy of Medical Sciences (RU), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Medizinische Fakultät, Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.