CORAL: Collaborative Online Oral Examinations [ID 1775]

INTRODUCTION: The pandemic affected U.S. medical education, prompting adoption of virtual platforms. However, faculty availability for resident didactics is limited. The CORAL project was undertaken by two residency programs. These programs developed a virtual faculty exchange program. The pilot project addressed faculty availability but also reduced bias and enhanced real-world applicability. The goals were to 1) assess feasibility of cross-institutional faculty conducting examinations, and 2) evaluate whether this experience is beneficial. METHODS: CORAL was exclusively for PGY4s. Three faculty members from the first program conducted examinations at the second program, and vice versa. These oral examinations were conducted virtually, with standardized questions and timing. Chief residents were surveyed before and after; faculty were surveyed only after the examination. RESULTS: Eighteen chief residents have completed the examination. One hundred percent found it helpful for oral boards. One hundred percent believed the examination was fair; 94.4% did not change preparation. Prior to the examination, 16.6% anticipated it would be helpful for written boards; this increased to 45.5% afterward. 66.6% initially felt it would be beneficial for oral boards, with this rising to 81.8% post-examination. All faculty found it to be fair and believed it would aid residents. Residents and faculty agreed oral examinations should continue in this format. 27.7% residents reported feeling more anxiety. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The new format for oral examinations was well-received. Thirty percent experienced increased stress. All agreed future mock examinations should be conducted this way. Both programs required fewer of their own faculty. This project offers a model for collaboration between residency programs or the creation of a broader consortium.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000005917.064
Primary Topic
Medical and Biological Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CORAL: Collaborative Online Oral Examinations [ID 1775]

Andrew B. Williams, Nagaraj Gabbur, S. Patel, Anar Yukhayev et al.
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Medical and Biological Sciences
article

CORAL: Collaborative Online Oral Examinations [ID 1775]

Andrew B. Williams, Nagaraj Gabbur, S. Patel, Anar Yukhayev, Susan Laela Alkasab
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The pandemic affected U.S. medical education, prompting adoption of virtual platforms. However, faculty availability for resident didactics is limited. The CORAL project was undertaken by two residency programs. These programs developed a virtual faculty exchange program. The pilot project addressed faculty availability but also reduced bias and enhanced real-world applicability. The goals were to 1) assess feasibility of cross-institutional faculty conducting examinations, and 2) evaluate whether this experience is beneficial. METHODS: CORAL was exclusively for PGY4s. Three faculty members from the first program conducted examinations at the second program, and vice versa. These oral examinations were conducted virtually, with standardized questions and timing. Chief residents were surveyed before and after; faculty were surveyed only after the examination. RESULTS: Eighteen chief residents have completed the examination. One hundred percent found it helpful for oral boards. One hundred percent believed the examination was fair; 94.4% did not change preparation. Prior to the examination, 16.6% anticipated it would be helpful for written boards; this increased to 45.5% afterward. 66.6% initially felt it would be beneficial for oral boards, with this rising to 81.8% post-examination. All faculty found it to be fair and believed it would aid residents. Residents and faculty agreed oral examinations should continue in this format. 27.7% residents reported feeling more anxiety. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The new format for oral examinations was well-received. Thirty percent experienced increased stress. All agreed future mock examinations should be conducted this way. Both programs required fewer of their own faculty. This project offers a model for collaboration between residency programs or the creation of a broader consortium.

Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 145(6S)
Northwell Health (US), Hofstra University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Medical and Biological Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.