Complexity Level of Virtual Simulation Scenarios for Command and Control Behaviors Assessment

This ongoing evaluates the command-and-control (C2) activities of rescue incident commanders. The study analyzes the assessment results of 382 commanders’ C2 behaviors using virtual simulation scenarios in two cases and compares them with other scenarios created through the Collaborative Authoring Process Model for Virtual Simulation Scenarios (CAPM). In the first scenario, involving a chemical leak in a hangar, 60 working incident commanders participated. In the second scenario, 83 commanders responded to a more complex case featuring fire spread and multiple casualties in a care home. Scenario complexity increases with the number of victims, key individuals, and the size of the building. When scenarios become overly complicated for first-level command, the standard ranking of common C2 behaviors is not maintained. To guide the development of future virtual simulation scenarios, recommendations for situational elements should be tailored to each command level, ensuring that the scenario storyline aligns with the appropriate level of likelihood and complexity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ... International ISCRAM Conference
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59297/v1mz7x03
Primary Topic
Technology Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complexity Level of Virtual Simulation Scenarios for Command and Control Behaviors Assessment

Reet Kasepalu, Stella Polikarpus
Proceedings of the ... International ISCRAM Conference
Technology Assessment and Management
article

Complexity Level of Virtual Simulation Scenarios for Command and Control Behaviors Assessment

Reet Kasepalu, Stella Polikarpus
article en

Abstract

This ongoing evaluates the command-and-control (C2) activities of rescue incident commanders. The study analyzes the assessment results of 382 commanders’ C2 behaviors using virtual simulation scenarios in two cases and compares them with other scenarios created through the Collaborative Authoring Process Model for Virtual Simulation Scenarios (CAPM). In the first scenario, involving a chemical leak in a hangar, 60 working incident commanders participated. In the second scenario, 83 commanders responded to a more complex case featuring fire spread and multiple casualties in a care home. Scenario complexity increases with the number of victims, key individuals, and the size of the building. When scenarios become overly complicated for first-level command, the standard ranking of common C2 behaviors is not maintained. To guide the development of future virtual simulation scenarios, recommendations for situational elements should be tailored to each command level, ensuring that the scenario storyline aligns with the appropriate level of likelihood and complexity.

Proceedings of the ... International ISCRAM Conference
Estonian Academy of Security Sciences (EE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Technology Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.