Research on the optimization of international arbitration rules in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: with reference to the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence

The Greater Bay Area is actively engaging in the international economic system. Aligning with the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence and improving related legal procedures is of great significance for enhancing the level of international arbitration. However, the Greater Bay Area currently lacks unified and clear standards for evidence disclosure and sanction measures; cross-examination is ineffective due to the varied levels of legal professionals; and immunity rights face challenges due to legal system differences and third-party funded arbitration. After a detailed study and consideration of the practical situation in the Greater Bay Area, targeted solutions are proposed, including the establishment of a unified immunity rights guideline, the design of a diversified regulatory model, and the clarification of a unified evidence disclosure model. These measures will help the Greater Bay Area build a more scientific and reasonable arbitration legal system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Social Behavior Research
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7102/2025.23080
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on the optimization of international arbitration rules in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: with reference to the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence

Peng Hu
Advances in Social Behavior Research
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

Research on the optimization of international arbitration rules in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: with reference to the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence

Peng Hu
article en

Abstract

The Greater Bay Area is actively engaging in the international economic system. Aligning with the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence and improving related legal procedures is of great significance for enhancing the level of international arbitration. However, the Greater Bay Area currently lacks unified and clear standards for evidence disclosure and sanction measures; cross-examination is ineffective due to the varied levels of legal professionals; and immunity rights face challenges due to legal system differences and third-party funded arbitration. After a detailed study and consideration of the practical situation in the Greater Bay Area, targeted solutions are proposed, including the establishment of a unified immunity rights guideline, the design of a diversified regulatory model, and the clarification of a unified evidence disclosure model. These measures will help the Greater Bay Area build a more scientific and reasonable arbitration legal system.

Advances in Social Behavior ResearchVol. 16(3)
Hunan Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.